Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jones v. St. Francis Cabrini Hosp., 652 So. 2d 1331.

20 citing documents.

  • Bcm, L.L.C. v. Roy Clifton Cheatwood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    4/10/95), Evangeline Farmers Coop.
  • Flood v. PENDLETON MEMORIAL METHODIST HOSP. 989 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Francis Cabrini Hospital, 94-2217 (La.4/10/95)
  • Adams v. Rhodia, Inc. 983 So. 2d 798 La. 2008
    Francis Cabrini Hospital, 94-2217 (La.4/10/95), , as an example of a case in which no weight was accorded the jury verdict despite the fact that the trial court's jury instruction, when taken as a whole, was not an erroneous statement of the law.
  • Adams v. Rhodia, Inc. 971 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Francis Cabrini Hospital, 94-2217, p. 7 (La.4/10/95), .
  • Norfleet v. LIFEGUARD TRANSP. SERVICE, INC. 934 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Francis Cabrini Hospital, 94-2217 (La.4/10/95); .
  • Hall v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd. 848 So. 2d 559 La. 2003
    Francis Cabrini Hospital, 94-2217 (La.4/10/95), ; (La.
  • Guillot v. Valley Forge Ins. Co. 753 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Francis Cabrini Hosp., 94-2217 (La.4/10/95); , our supreme court awarded $100,000.00 to each of the two adult children of the elderly decedent.
  • Greer v. Lammico 712 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Francis Cabrini Hospital, 94-2217 (La.4/10/95), , this court held that a "settlement under the Act is an admission and establishment of liability" for the original harm caused by the act of malpractice which "the Fund is not permitted to refute or challenge at trial."
  • Graham v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 699 So. 2d 365 La. 1997
    Francis Cabrini Hosp., 94-2217 (La.4/10/95); , the court stated that Dr. Wright's settlement for $100,000 was an admission of liability for the original harm caused by the malpractice and that "the fact of settlement forecloses any further consideration of cause-in-fact, duty, breach and harm."
  • Greer v. Lammico 688 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    4/10/95), , this court held that a "settlement under the Act is an admission and establishment of liability" for the original harm caused by the act of malpractice which "the Fund is not permitted to refute or challenge at trial."
  • Graham v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 686 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Francis Cabrini Hosp., 94-2217 (La.4/10/95), .
  • Bannerman v. Bishop 688 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    04/10/95), ($100,000 each); Gordon v. Willis Knighton Medical Center, supra ($100,000 and $125,000); (La.App.
  • Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Found. 679 So. 2d 893 La. 1996
    Francis Cabrini Hospital, (La.
  • Gauthreaux v. Trosclair 676 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    4/10/95), -36 ; -87 (La.
  • Pendleton v. Barrett 675 So. 2d 720 La. 1996
    4/10/95); assists us in solving this dilemma.
  • McDougal v. Blanch 672 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Begnaud v. Department of Transp. & Dev. 679 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • Graham v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 662 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    4/10/95), , the Supreme Court reasserted that a settlement under the Act is an admission and establishment of liability for the "original harm," which the Fund is not permitted to refute or challenge at trial.
  • Turner v. Massiah 656 So. 2d 636 La. 1995
  • Doe v. Doe 657 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    4/10/95), ; Otnott v. Morgan, M.D., 93-0684 (La.App.