DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 655 So. 2d 309.

59 citing documents.

  • Richard Fountain v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and/or Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
  • Luft v. Winn Dixie Montgomery, LLC 228 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
  • Gregory v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 35 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), ; Tanner v. Brookshire Grocery Co., 29,276 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), .
  • McElroy v. Wilhite 903 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), ; Marshall v. Caddo Parish School Board, 32,373 (La.App.
  • Collins v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 833 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), ; Marshall v. Caddo Parish School Board, 32,373 (La.
  • Dickerson v. Winn-Dixie, Inc. 816 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    [3] Dickerson incorrectly relies on Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), , in support for her arguments.
  • Haring v. Stinson 756 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 *1204 (La.5/22/95), .
  • Marshall v. Caddo Parish School Bd. 743 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.05/22/95), ; Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., supra .
  • Tantillo v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 739 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In an unpublished opinion, this court, relying on Welch v. Winn Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95); , affirmed the lower court’s judgment by decision dated November 8, 1996.
  • Meshell v. Lovell 732 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), .
  • Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 726 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.05/22/95), .
  • Broussard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 741 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    9:2800.6 and expressly overruled Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95); .
  • Cooper v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 725 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    NOTES [1] The case currently before the court was tried and decided when Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), applied.
  • Coleman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 721 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    However, on May 22, 1995, the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the First Circuit's decision in Welch v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95); .
  • O'BRIEN v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 720 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    9:2800.6 is White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-0393 (La.9/9/97), , which expressly overruled Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), .
  • Wehbe v. Waguespack 720 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie, 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), .
  • Knight v. State 718 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), .
  • Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 715 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    In overruling its own decision in the case of Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95); , the White court found that there was no showing of the required temporal element.
  • Brister v. Continental Ins. Co. 712 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), .
  • Lacy v. ABC Ins. Co. 712 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    ANALYSIS Appellate courts in Louisiana are bound by the recent decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court in White, supra, which specifically overruled Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., as an incorrect interpretation of the statute and as contrary to what the Supreme Court characterizes as the clear and unambiguous meaning of La.
  • Diez v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 709 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    In that case, the court overruled its earlier decision in Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95); , in which it had concluded a claimant had carried her burden of proving constructive notice by showing the absence of written inspection procedures, the lack of written documentation of the performance of inspections, and the lack of company directives on a consistent inspection policy.
  • McCrea v. Petroleum, Inc. 705 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    At trial, plaintiff specifically objected to the trial court's failure to charge the jury that a merchant has a duty to have in place mandatory periodic inspection procedures, as articulated in Welch v. Winn-Dixie, 94 2331 (La.5/22/95); , overruled, White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-0393 (La.9/9/97), .
  • Dumas and Associates, Inc. v. Lewis Enterprises Inc. 704 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), .
  • Beninate v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 704 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    In White , the Supreme Court specifically overruled Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), .
  • Barton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 704 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    9:2800.6 was clear and unambiguous, overruled Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), .
  • Rodgers v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 702 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    In that respect, the majority specifically overruled Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana Inc., 94-2331 (La.05/22/95), .
  • Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 702 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), ; Tanner v. Brookshire Grocery Co., 29,276 (La.App.2d Cir. 4/2/97), .
  • Overruled White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 699 So. 2d 1081 La. 1997
    Because Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95) , is contrary to the clear meaning of La.
  • Bennett v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 696 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331, p. 9-11 (La.5/22/95); .
  • Williams v. Rouse's Enterprises, Inc. 693 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    In Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, 94-2331, p. 17, (La.5/22/95), , the' Louisiana Supreme Court held a plaintiff could establish lack of reasonable care by *1300 proving a merchant had no “uniform, mandatory, non-discretionary, clean-up and safety procedure.” In the absence of such a policy, the court held, it was unnecessary for a plaintiff to show precisely how long a foreig
  • Delahoussaye v. Delchamps, Inc. 693 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    The applicable pre-May 1, 1996 version of the statute is “decidedly pro-defendant.” Welch v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331, p. 9 (La.5/22/95); .
  • Dauzat v. Canal Ins. Co. 692 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    See Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95); , citing inter alia, LaHaye v. Allstate Ins.
  • Kelly v. Boh Bros. Const. Co., Inc. 694 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie, 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), .
  • Driggers v. Kroger Co. 692 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    05/22/95), ; Billiot v. Cline, 27,396 (La.App.2d Cir. 09/27/95), , writ denied, 95-2595 (La.
  • Alexander v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 692 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    The applicable pre-May 1, 1996 version of the statute is “decidedly pro-defendant.” Welch v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331, p. 9 (La.5/22/95); .
  • Tanner v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 691 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • Jackson v. Delchamps, Inc. 691 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    9:2800.6 is a “decidedly pro-defendant statute.” Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331, p. 6 (La.5/22/95), .
  • White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 688 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    2nd Cir.1993); Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95) .
  • Holden v. STATE UNIV. MED. CENTER 690 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    ) The Supreme Court addressed the new statute for the first time after its amendment in 1990, in Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
  • Myles v. Brookshires Grocery Co. 687 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95), .
  • Stewart v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 686 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331 (La.5/22/95) .
  • Foster v. Liberty Rice Mill 690 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331, p. 16 (La.5/22/95); .
  • Broussard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 682 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331, p. 9 (La.5/22/95); .
  • JAG v. Schmaltz 682 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 94-2331, p. 14 (La.5/22/95), .
  • Temple v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets 677 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Magee v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. 676 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    5/22/95), , in which a jury verdict was reinstated in favor of the plaintiff who had slipped on cooking oil.
  • Dixon v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 673 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Schlesinger v. Herzog 672 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Adkinson v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Inc. 670 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    5/22/95), ), as follows: B. In a negligence claim brought against a merchant by a person lawfully on the merchant's premises for damages as a result of an injury, death, or loss sustained because of a fall due to a condition existing in or on a merchant's premises, the claimant shall have the burden of proving, and in addition
  • Domangue v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 665 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    5/22/95); , a case in which proof of constructive knowledge was necessary because actual knowledge was not a fact.