DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Turner v. Massiah, 656 So. 2d 636.

21 citing documents.

  • Bailey v. DeLaCruz 143 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    In Turner v. Massiah, 94-2548 (La.06/16/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: The damage here, Stage 2 breast cancer, cannot be apportioned between the two tortfeasors because the damage is not severable; it is indivisible.
  • Clayton Bias v. Dr. Frederico Del Toro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 7/1/94)]; 641 So.2d [610,] at 617[, reversed in part on other grounds, 94-2548 (La.6/16/95); ]; Soteropulos [v. Schmidt, 556 So.2d [276] at 278 [(La.App.
  • Bias v. Del Toro 77 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 7/1/94) ], 641 So.2d [610,] at 617[, reversed in part on other grounds, 94-2548 (La.6/16/95); ]; Soteropulos [v. Schmidt], 556 So.2d [276] at 278 [ (La.App.
  • Bickham v. Louisiana Emergency Medical Consultants, Inc. 52 So. 3d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See Turner v. Massiah, 94-2548 (La.6/16/95), ; see also Maraist, 00-0404 at p. 7, 808 So.2d at 570 .
  • Douglas v. Children's Hospital 69 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In Turner v. Massiah, 94-2548 (La.6/16/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that two doctors’ failure to diagnose breast cancer did not result in the application of two caps.
  • Beverly Hobbs v. Patrick Savoy, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    6/16/95), the fifth circuit stated: Generally, where the alleged acts of negligence raise issues peculiar to the particular specialty involved, then only those qualified in that specialty may offer evidence of the applicable standards.
  • Hobbs v. Savoy 984 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    App. 5 Cir. 7/1/94), , aff'd in part and rev'd in part on other grounds, 94-2548 (La.6/16/95), , the fifth circuit stated: Generally, where the alleged acts of negligence raise issues peculiar to the particular specialty involved, then only those qualified in that specialty may offer evidence of the applicable standards.
  • Massiha v. Beahm 966 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    5 Cir. 7/1/94) , , affirmed in part and reversed in part, 94-2548 (La.6/16/95), .
  • Hernandez v. Chalmette Medical Center 869 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    In Turner v. Massiah, 94-2548 (La.6/16/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court was faced with the question of whether to allow two caps in a case where two separate physicians had failed to diagnose the plaintiff's breast cancer.
  • Armand v. State Department of Health & Human Resources 822 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    5th Cir. 7/1/94), , rev’d in part on other grounds, 94-2548 (La.6/16/95), .
  • Maraist v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 808 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In Turner v. Massiah, 94-2548, p. 7 (La.6/16/95), , the supreme court discussed the application of La.
  • Batson v. SOUTH LOUISIANA MEDICAL CTR. 778 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    6/16/95), -641 (La.1995)(interpreting LSA-R.S.
  • Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center 750 So. 2d 949 La. 1999
    In Turner v. Massiah, 94-2548 (La.8/30/95); , where two physicians failed to diagnose the plaintiffs breast cancer, we stated: If the damage or injury could have been divided into two parts, one part caused by one defendant and the other part caused by the other, there would have been, in effect, two injuries.
  • Johns v. Agrawal 748 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    See Turner v. Massiah, 94-2548 (La.6/16/95), ; LaMark v. NME Hospitals, Inc., (La.
  • Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank 738 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    As Turner v. Massiah, 94-2548 (La.6/16/95); , concluded, an apportionment of fault cannot always be utilized as an apportionment of damages.
  • Remet v. Martin 737 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Turner v. Massiah, 94-2548 (La.6/16/95), .
  • Greer v. Lammico 688 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    6/16/95), , and argue in brief that the Louisiana Supreme Court has observed that oncology experts generally accept that, if diagnosed with Stage I cancer, where breast cancer is localized in a breast and a mastectomy is timely performed, the patient has a 75-80% chance of survival but that, if diagnosed with Stage II cancer, w
  • Hebert v. Podiatry Ins. Co. of America 688 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    5 Cir. 7/1/94) ; , reversed in part on other grounds, 94-2548 (La.6/16/95); ; (La.App.
  • Seagers v. Pailet 680 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    6/16/95) , the trial court cast the physicians in judgment for the interest on their $100,000 shares, which was mentioned but not discussed by the appellate court (malpractice in 1987; suit filed in 1988).
  • Merritt v. Karcioglu 668 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    6/16/95), , the court stated: The statute limits both recovery and liability...
  • Calcagno v. Decorte 665 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995