DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 650 So. 2d 757.

174 citing documents.

  • Richardson v. Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Co. 181 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • Williams v. Mathieu 155 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 1/16/08), (citing Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), ).
  • Lawrence v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 151 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See also Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, p. 6 (La.2/20/95), , 761 |28(“In order to defeat the presumption, defendant must show some other particular incident could have caused the injury in question.”).
  • Clement v. Carbon 153 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 (La.2/20/95); .
  • Frost v. Carter 140 So. 3d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, p. 3 (La.2/22/95), ; American Motorist Ins.
  • Hammond v. Rahsaana 135 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), (holding that a plaintiff in a personal injury suit has the burden of proving a causal relationship between the injury and the accident which caused the injury).
  • Kliebert v. Breaud 134 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    |7The defendants’ assertion that the plaintiffs claims must fall without medical evidence is based on the principles set out in Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 (La.2/20/95), : In a personal injury suit, plaintiff bears the burden of proving a causal relationship between the injury sustained and the accident which caused the injury.
  • Ricky Fontenot v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 and 94- 2615, p. 3 (La.2/20/95)
  • Dianne Denley v. Sherri B. Berlin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    2/20/95), noted: In a personal injury suit, plaintiff bears the burden of proving a causal relationship between the injury sustained and the accident which caused the injury.
  • Denley v. Berlin 114 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Additionally, the supreme court in Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), , noted: In a personal injury suit, plaintiff bears the burden of proving a causal relationship between the injury sustained and the accident which caused the injury.
  • Ashby v. Casey 111 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Byrnside v. Hutto 110 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Serou v. Touro Infirmary 105 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615 (La.2/20/95), (holding that a plaintiff in a personal injury suit has the burden of proving a causal relationship between the injury and the accident which caused the injury).
  • Henderson v. Gregory 93 So. 3d 818 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 (La.2/20/95), .
  • D'Angelo v. Guarino 88 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 4/2/03)], 842 So.2d [478] at 484; Maranto [v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.], supra [ ].
  • Gober v. Walgreen Louisiana Co. 80 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber, 94-2603 (La.2/20/95), ; Bradshaw v. Brookshire Grocery Co., 38,960 (La.App.2d Cir.10/27/04), .
  • Smith v. Transport Services Co. 67 So. 3d 487 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
    and Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 (La.2/20/95), (Victory, J., not on panel).
  • Davis v. Foremost Dairies 58 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615 (La.2/20/95), ; Montgomery v. Kedgy, 44,601 (La.App.2d Cir.8/26/09), , unit denied, 09-2110 (La.11/25/09), .
  • Thomas v. Comfort Center of Monroe, LA, Inc. 48 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Craig Steven Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 49 So. 3d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Williams v. Stewart 46 So. 3d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), ; Jones , 95-0574 at p. 13, 675 So.2d at 763
  • Alisa Simon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Simon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 43 So. 3d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Virginia Peoples, Et Ux. v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    2/20/95), (citation omitted).
  • Peoples v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. 38 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Several years later, the supreme court reiterated that, “[i]n order to defeat the [.Housley ] presumption, defendant must show some other particular incident could have caused the injury in question.” Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, p. 6 (La.2/20/95), (citation omitted).
  • In Re Benge 24 So. 3d 822 La. 2009
    At that time, counsel for plaintiff Mr. Venezia submitted the case of Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615 (La.2/20/95), , discussed in n. 13, infra, in support of his client’s claim for damages.
  • Holmes v. Hicks 24 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Montgomery v. Kedgy 21 So. 3d 980 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Guillory v. Lee 16 So. 3d 1104 La. 2009
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 and 94-2615, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Harrington v. Wilson 8 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 (La.2/22/95), .
  • Vega v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 996 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, (La.2/20/95), .
  • Harris v. Delta Development Partnership 994 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Saunders v. ANPAC LOUISIANA INS. CO. 988 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 1994-2603 (La.02/20/95), .
  • McNeill v. LANDSTAR RANGER, INC. 986 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 (La.2/20/95), ; Edwards v. LCR-M Corp., Inc., 41,125 (La.App.2d Cir.7/12/06), .
  • Bennett v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. 983 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 (La.2/20/95), ; Edwards v. LCR-M Corp., Inc., 41,125 (La.App.2d Cir.7/12/06), .
  • Cannet v. Franklynn Pest Control Co., Inc. 985 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Bittner v. Scott 980 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), ; Jones , 95-0574 at p. 13, 675 So.2d at 763 .
  • Schindler v. Harrah's Las Vegas, Inc. 976 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 and 94-2615, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), ; Maldonado v. Louisiana Superdome Com'n, 95-2490, p. 11 (La.App.
  • Woolfolk v. TRISM, INC. 976 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, (La.2/20/95), .
  • Toby P. Armentor v. Safeway Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2/20/95), (citations omitted): In a personal injury suit, plaintiff bears the burden of proving a causal relationship between the injury sustained and the accident which caused the injury.
  • Armentor v. Safeway Ins. Co. 972 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the plaintiff's burden of proof regarding causation in the context of a personal injury lawsuit in Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), (citations omitted): In a personal injury suit, plaintiff bears the burden of proving a causal relationship between the injury sustained and the accident which caused the injury.
  • Venissat v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 968 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Theodore Venissat v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Charles Layssard v. State of La., Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Layssard v. STATE, DEPART. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 963 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Oden v. Gales 960 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615, p. 3 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Breitenbach v. Stroud 959 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, 94-2603, 94-2615 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Detraz v. Lee 950 So. 2d 557 La. 2007
    and Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603 (La.2/20/95), (Victory, J., not on panel).
  • Ridgeway v. Pierre 950 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Maranto v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., 94-2603 (La.2/20/95), ."