Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Walters v. Metropolitan Erection Co., 644 So. 2d 1143.

14 citing documents.

Shaquana Harvey, Individually and in Her Capacity as the Natural Tutrix of Jaden Harvey v. Eric Wayne Hamby, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 10/27/94), (La.
Knoten v. Westbrook 193 So. 3d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Lakewood Property Owners' Ass'n v. Kyle 183 So. 3d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 10/27/94) , , writs denied 94-2858 & 94-2870 (La.2/9/95), .
Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Board 80 So. 3d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 10/27/94), ; see also West v. Ray, 210 La.
River Bend Capital, LLC v. Lloyd's of London 63 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 973 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Trunk v. MED. CENTER OF LA. AT NEW ORLEANS 863 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4th Cir.10/27/94); , writs denied, 94-2858 and 94-2870 (La.2/9/95); .
ALLVEND v. Payphone Commissions Co., Inc. 804 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 10/27/94) , , writs denied 94-2858 & 94-2870 (La.2/9/95), .
White v. City of New Orleans 806 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4th Cir.1997) (new matters, which would, even assuming the allegations of the Petition to be true, defeat plaintiffs cause of action, constitute affirmative defenses which must be specifically ser forth in defendant's Answer); (La.App.
Johnson v. Rogers & Phillips, Inc. 753 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Gumpert v. Pittman Const. Co., Inc. 736 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 10/27/94), , writs denied, 94-2858, 94-2870, citing, (La.
Morgan v. ABC MANUFACTURER 694 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
App. 4 Cir. 10/27/94), , writs denied, 94-2858 and 94-2870 (La.2/9/95), , noted the several factors to be considered when determining the existence of the borrowed servant doctrine: There is no fixed test, nor is the existence of a contract or any other single factor determinative, but the following factors should be con
Dustin v. DHCI Home Health Services, Inc. 673 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
4th Cir. 10/27/94); , writs denied, 94-2858 and 94-2870 (La.
Garvin v. Perret 670 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
4 Cir. 10/27/94) , , the court analyzed the borrowed servant doctrine as follows: There is no fixed test, nor is the existence of a contract or any other single factor determinative, but the following factors should be considered in determining the existence of a borrowed servant relationship: "(1) first and foremost, right of con

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by