DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Braud, 646 So. 2d 1168.

16 citing documents.

  • Succession of Loney Landry. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • Succession of Dorothy Terrell Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    4 Cir. 11/17/94), writ denied, 95-383 (La.
  • Succession of Charles R. Westerchil La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    4 Cir. 11/17/94), writ denied, 95-383 (La.
  • Succession of Holzenthal 101 So. 3d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • In Re Succession of Hollis 987 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 11/17/94) , , writ denied, 95-0383 (La.3/30/95), .
  • In Re Succession of Polk 940 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 11/17/94), , writ denied, 95-383 (La.3/30/95), : The caselaw is clear that proof of the presence of a mentally-debilitating condition at the approximate time that the will was executed is insufficient to prove lack of testamentary capacity at the time the will was executed by clear and convincing evidence, es
  • Succession of Juliette Bijou Polk La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 11/17/94), writ denied, 95-383 (La.
  • In Re Succession of Crawford 923 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    4th Cir.11/17/94), , writ denied, 95-0383 (La.3/30/95), ; Succession of Christensen, 94-0263 (La.App.
  • In Re Succession of Culotta 900 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    4 Cir. 11/17/94, , writ denied 95-0383 (La.3/30/95) .
  • In Re Succession of Gilbert 850 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    4th Cir.11/17/94), , writ denied, 95-0383 (La.3/10/95), .
  • Successions of Tanner 836 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • In Re Succession of Linder 824 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 11/17/94), , writ denied, 95-0383 (La.3/30/95), .
  • In Re Succession of Chauffepied 775 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 11/17/94); , writ denied, 95-383 (La.3/30/95); , which states: The only witnesses present when the will was actually executed all testified unequivocally that [the testator] did have the necessary mental capacity to execute the will on the day the will was actually prepared.
  • Cupples v. Pruitt 754 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 11/17/94) , , writ denied 95-0383 (La.3/10/95), .
  • In Re Succession of Deshotels 735 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 11/17/94); , writ denied, 95-383 (La.3/30/95); (emphasis added), stated: The only witnesses present when the will was actually executed all testified unequivocally that [the testator] did have the necessary mental capacity to execute the will on the day the will was actually prepared.
  • Webb v. Webb 677 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    4th Cir. 11/17/94), ; Succession of Hamiter, supra .