Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Juneau v. Strawmyer, 647 So. 2d 1294.

30 citing documents.

Courtney Jo Tully v. Alfredo Granillo, Hudgins Roofing Company, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 12/15/94), Kelly v. AME Janitorial Services Co., 09-1167 (La.
Victoria Roach v. State of Louisiana, Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
4 Cir. 12/15/94), (alteration in original), the fourth circuit recognized that “[n]o one should be allowed to testify untruthfully in a court of law and then secure protection from exposure by claiming that evidence disclosing his lie is more prejudicial than probative.” Therein the court determined that the trial court was corre
Watson v. Hicks 172 So. 3d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 12/15/94), ); see also Frost v. Carter, 13-0375, pp. 7-9 (La.App.
Pratt v. Culpepper 162 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
4th Cir.12/15/94), ; Arnold v. Dufrene, 01-1179 (La.App.
Lawrence v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 151 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 12/15/94), -99 , (La.App.
Frost v. Carter 140 So. 3d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
App. 4 Cir. 12/15/94), ).
Reddoch v. Parish of Plaquemines 134 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
D'Angelo v. Guarino 88 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Kellianne Kelly-Williams,indiv., Etc. v. At&t Mobility, LLC . La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Kelly-Williams v. AT & T Mobility, LLC 90 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Miriam H. Dyess v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Williams v. Stewart 46 So. 3d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Kelly v. AME JANITORIAL SERVICES CO. 33 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
App. 4 Cir. 12/15/94), , this Court held that in order for a plaintiff to benefit from the Housley presumption of causation, three (3) things must be established by a preponderance of the evidence.
Jordan v. Vice 943 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Robert C. Jordan v. Zoie R. Vice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Edwards v. LCR-M CORP., INC. 936 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Jaramillo v. Lopez 925 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 12/15/94) , , this Court stated that for a plaintiff to benefit from the Housley presumption of causation, three things must be established by a preponderance of the evidence.
Peters v. Williams 917 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Chavers v. Travis 902 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Michelle Detraz v. Victor Lee D/B/A Virgin Nails La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 12/15/94), the fourth circuit described the three requirements for the application of Housley: First, he must prove he was in good health prior to the accident at issue.
Detraz v. Lee 900 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 12/15/94) , , the fourth circuit described the three requirements for the application of Housley : First, he must prove he was in good health prior to the accident at issue.
Williams v. Williams 899 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Poland v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 885 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Appellees rely on Juneau v. Strawmyer, 94-0903 (La.App.4 Cir. 12/15/94), in asserting that a preexisting condition disqualifies a plaintiff from entitlement to a Housley presumption.
Adams v. Traina 830 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Kropp v. Occhipinti 751 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Marshall v. Caddo Parish School Bd. 743 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Konneker v. Sewerage & Water Bd. 703 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
4th Cir. 12/15/94), -99 .
Maldonado v. Louisiana Superdome Com'n 687 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
4th Cir. 12/15/94), -99 .
Jones v. Peyton Place, Inc. 675 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
4th Cir. 12/15/94), -99 .
Matthews v. Consolidated Companies, Inc. 657 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
4 Cir. 12/15/94) , ; Ronquillo v. Belle Chase Marine Transp., Inc., , 1363 et seq.