DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 646 So. 2d 859.

253 citing documents.

  • Hill v. TMR Exploration, Inc. 223 So. 3d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    11/30/94), -865 , the supreme court explained the requirements for pleading the unconstitutionality of a statute in the district court: Our Code of Civil Procedure does not require a single procedure or type of proceeding for challenging or assailing the constitutionality of a statute.
  • State v. Saulny 220 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Kendrick v. Hercules Concrete Pumping Service, Inc. 216 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • George v. Christus Health Southwestern Louisiana 203 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    11/30/94), (emphasis added).
  • BRYANT GEORGE, M.D. VERSUS 2010-6004 CHRISTUS HEALTH SOUTHWESTERN LOUISIANA Consolidated With BRYANT GEORGE, M.D. VERSUS 2011-2211 CHRISTUS HEALTH … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    11/30/94), (emphasis added).
  • State v. Sadeghi 194 So. 3d 611 La. 2016
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -865 .
  • State ex rel. Arnaud v. State 188 So. 3d 1004 La. 2016
    State v. Schoening, 00-0903, p. 3 (La.10(17/00), (citing Valla v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238, p, 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 ).
  • Mudge v. Plaquemines Parish Council 192 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See Perez, 12-0941, p. 7, 108 So.3d at 903 ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 4 (La.11/30/94), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Bonilla 186 So. 3d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Derrick Shepherd v. Thomas Schedler, in His Official Capacity as the Secretary of State for the State of … La. 2016
    11/30/94), -865 (“[A] statute must first be questioned in the trial court, not the appellate courts, and the unconstitutionality of a statute must be specially pleaded and the grounds for the claim particularized.”).
  • Michael J. Leger, II v. Danielle Gotreaux Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    11/30/94), (emphasis added) (citations omitted) (footnotes omitted)).
  • Leger v. Leger 215 So. 3d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-450, p. 1 (La.4/27/07), -74 (quoting Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), (emphasis added) (citations omitted) (footnotes omitted)).
  • Lake Air Capital II, LLC v. Perera 172 So. 3d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 *90 (La.11/30/94); -865 .
  • State v. Tillery 167 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    10 State v. Hatton, 07-2377 (La.7/1/08); -20 (citing State v. Schoening, 00-0903 (La.10/17/00); (citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94); -65 )).
  • Melvin Anthony Tassin v. Constance Mikita Tassin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Tassin v. Tassin 161 So. 3d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2164 provides that “[t]he appellate court shall render any judgment which is just, legal, and proper upon the record on appeal.” This article permits an appellate court “to remand a case when the interest of justice is served.” Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p 9 (La.11/30/94), .
  • State v. Jackson 154 So. 3d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -865 .
  • State of Louisiana v. Carl J. Webb, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    11/30/94), ), the supreme court stated, “It is well-settled that a constitutional challenge may not be considered by an appellate court unless it was properly pleaded and raised in the trial court below.” The supreme court further described the procedure for attacking the constitutionality of a statute as follows:
  • State v. Webb 149 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    In Hatton, 985 So.2d at 718 (citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), ), the supreme court stated, “It is well-settled that a constitutional challenge may not be considered by an appellate court unless it was properly pleaded and raised in the trial court below.” The supreme court further described the procedure for attacking the constitutionality of a statute as follows: While there is
  • State in the Interest of D.A., D.G., D.G., D.D., and Z.K. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94)
  • In Re: Angela Marie Costanza and Chasity Shanelle Brewer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94- 1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65.
  • State v. Kennedy 140 So. 3d 1201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    See State v. Hatton, 2007-2377 (La.7/1/08), , and Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Woodard v. Upp 142 So. 3d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), -865 .
  • Joshua Dore v. State of Louisiana, Dps, Office of Motor Vehicles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    11/30/94), -65 (footnote omitted).
  • Dore v. State, Department of Public Safety, Office of Motor Vehicles 153 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    However, “the long-standing jurisprudential rule of law is: a statute must first be questioned |4in the trial court, not the appellate courts, and the unconstitutionality of a statute must be specially pleaded and the grounds for the claim particularized.” Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 (footnote omitted).
  • State v. Smith 144 So. 3d 867 La. 2014
  • Explained Williams v. Monroe City School Board 131 So. 3d 833 La. 2014
    In Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 at p. 7 (La.11/30/94), , we explained “[t]he attorney general is not an indispensable party; but, he must be served in declaratory judgment actions which seek a declaration of unconstitutionality of a statute.” The purpose of the service requirement in La.Code Civ.
  • Shields v. Parish of Jefferson 131 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
    Rogoz v. Tangipahoa Parish Council, 08-2789 (La.1/30/09); ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94); -65 .
  • Troy Pitre v. Bessette Development Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    11/30/94), -65 (footnote omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court wrote, “the long-standing jurisprudential rule of law is: a statute must first be questioned in the trial court, not the appellate courts, and the unconstitutionality of a statute must be specially pleaded and the grounds for the claim particularized.” Pias c
  • Jo Ann Lopez v. Isle of Capri Casino La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    11/30/94), his action is excepted from the requirement that he raise the issue for the first time on appeal because of our supervisory jurisdiction over lower courts.
  • Pitre v. Bessette Development Corp. 126 So. 3d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 (footnote omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court wrote, “the long-standing jurisprudential rule of law is: a statute must first be questioned in the trial court, not the appellate courts, and the unconstitutionality of a statute must be specially pleaded and the grounds for the claim particularized.” Pias corre
  • Lopez v. Isle of Capri Casino 127 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Application to the facts Pias argues that under Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), , his action is excepted from the requirement that he raise the issue for the first time on appeal because of our supervisory jurisdiction over lower courts.
  • State ex rel. C.M. 128 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -865 ; See also State v. Hatton, 07-2377, p. 13 (La.7/1/08), -719 .
  • State ex rel. D.W. 125 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), -65 ; See also State v. Hatton, 07-2377 (La.7/1/08), .
  • State v. Quinn 123 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Furthermore, lasMhough there is no single procedure for challenging the constitutionality of a statute, our jurisprudence has established that a statute “must first be questioned in the trial court ..., and the unconstitutionality of a statute must be specially pleaded and the grounds for the claim particularized.” Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 (footnote omitted).
  • State v. Bazile 144 So. 3d 719 La. 2013
    Id., 2011-2201, p. 7; 85 So.3d at 5 ; see State v. Schoening, 2000-0903, p. 3 (La.10/17/00); , quoting Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 1994-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94); -865 (“This court has stated that, while there is no single required procedure or type of proceeding for attacking a statute’s constitutionality, ‘the long-standing jurisprudential rule of law is ...
  • State v. Overstreet 111 So. 3d 308 La. 2013
    State v. Schoening, 00-0903, p. 3 (La.10/17/00), (citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 ).
  • Louisiana High School Athletics Ass'n v. State 107 So. 3d 583 La. 2013
    See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, pp. 8-9 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Prejean v. Barousse 107 So. 3d 569 La. 2013
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -865 ; Arrington v. Galen-Med, Inc., 06-2968, p. 3 (La.2/2/07), -729 .
  • State v. Duheart 125 So. 3d 1054 La. 2012
    See State v. Schoening, 00-0903, p. 3 (La.10/17/00), , quoting Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 (“This court has stated that, while there is no single required procedure or type of proceeding for attacking a statute’s constitutionality, ‘the long-standing jurisprudential rule of law is ...
  • Johnson v. Motiva Enterprises, LLC 95 So. 3d 1086 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    An appellate court may not consider a constitutional challenge unless it was “properly raised and pleaded in the trial court below.” Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), ; State v. Hatton, 2007-2377, p. 13 (La.7/1/08), .
  • Oliver v. MAGNOLIA CLINIC 85 So. 3d 39 La. 2012
    11/30/94), ("the unconstitutionality of a statute must be specially pleaded and the grounds for the claim particularized").
  • Dionysia Prejean v. Robert T. Barousse, Acadia Parish Clerk of Court La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co. Inc., et al, 94-CA-1238
  • State v. Veal 83 So. 3d 211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • State of Louisiana v. v. L. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    11/30/94), the supreme court stated: When the constitutionality of a statute, ordinance or franchise is assailed in a declaratory judgment action the attorney general must be served with a copy of the proceeding and he is entitled to be heard and/or, at his discretion, to represent or supervis
  • In re Succession of Bailey 82 So. 3d 322 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
    Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-450 (La.4/27/07); , 574 the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated its finding in Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94); by stating the following regarding the pleading of the unconstitutionality of a statute: Our Code of Civil Procedure does not require a single procedure or type of proceeding for challenging or assailing the constitutionality of a statute.
  • Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. 77 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    However, a memorandum, opposition or brief is not a pleading, see Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), , and therefore, raising the issue in a memorandum is not the equivalent of raising the issue in an actual pleading or motion.
  • UTELCOM, Inc. v. Bridges 77 So. 3d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    art. 1880; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Joe Oliver v. Magnolia Clinic La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Oliver v. MAGNOLIA CLINIC 71 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 7/6/07), -42 , writs denied, 07-1614, 07-1628 (La.12/7/07), , 631 (emphasis added), the Louisiana Supreme Court has said: “[0]ur Code of Civil Procedure does not require a single procedure or type of proceeding for challenging or assailing the constitutionality of a statute.” [Val- *1190 lo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), ,] 864.