Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stewart v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., 657 So. 2d 1327.
-
Angela Expose v. Rouses Enterprises, LLC D/B/A Rouses Markets
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 3/16/95), ).
-
Cooper v. Chamberlain
266 So. 3d 316
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Stewart v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. , , 1330 (La.
- Ronda Maxwell Hudson v. Clint Tucker Strother La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
-
Hudson v. Strother
246 So. 3d 851
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Stewart v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. , , 1330 (La.App.
-
Carl Jones, Sr. v. Centerpoint Energy Entex
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/16/95), wherein the fourth circuit concluded that the trial court did not err in excluding videotape and testimony that 24 would have established the store’s conditions and display configurations at various times after the relevant accident.
-
Jones v. Centerpoint Energy Entex
66 So. 3d 539
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/16/95) , , wherein the fourth circuit concluded that the trial court did not err in excluding videotape and testimony that l^would have established the store’s conditions and display configurations at various times after the relevant accident.
- Phillips v. OLD EVANGELINE DOWNS, LLC 5 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Lisa Phillips v. the Old Evangeline Downs, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Roth v. New Hotel Monteleone, LLC 978 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- Taylor v. Entergy Corp. 816 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- Lawyer v. Succession of Kountz Ex Rel. Kupit 806 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- Davenport v. Albertson's, Inc. 774 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
-
Smith v. Brookshire Grocery Co.
750 So. 2d 450
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
4th Cir.3/16/95), , we must conclude in the case sub judice that the trial court erred in finding that Ms. Smith carried her burden of proving constructive notice under the provisions of La.
-
Baggett v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets
750 So. 2d 1027
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
4th Cir. 3/16/95); ; Diez v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc., 97 0034 (La.
- Burkett v. Crescent City Connection 730 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
- Diez v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 709 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
-
Bennett v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
696 So. 2d 631
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
4th Cir. 3/16/95); , where videotapes and testimony regarding a store's floor conditions approximately one year after an accident were ruled inadmissible on the basis that "[tjhe relevant issue is not what A & P's policy was in 1992, 1993 or 1994, but whether the offending banana had been on the floor of the produce aisle on t