Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. Steimle & Assoc., Inc., 652 So. 2d 44.

17 citing documents.

Vesta Halay Johnston v. Susan Halay Vincent La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
5 Cir. 2/15/95), stated: 11 However, we agree with the First Circuit Court of Appeal that anyone who conspires to injure a party’s competitor in violation of La.R.S.
Newton v. Brenan 166 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Yur-Mar, LLC v. Jefferson Parish Council 90 So. 3d 1137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Mother of Eden, LLC v. Chris Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Mother of Eden, LLC v. Thomas 86 So. 3d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Cheramie Services, Inc. v. Shell Deepwater Production, Inc. 14 So. 3d LV La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 2/15/95), , and stated: Sunbelt and Emmer argue that the unfair trade practices act does not apply to them because they are neither consumers or business competitors.
Cheramie Services v. Shell Deepwater Prod. 14 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 2/15/95), , and stated: Sunbelt and Emmer argue that the unfair trade practices act does not apply to them because they are neither consumers or business competitors.
Nola Express, L.L.C. v. New Orleans Aviation Board 826 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Silliman Private School Corporation v. Shareholder Group 789 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
5th Cir.2/15/95), ; Robbins v. State, State Land Office, 97-671, p. 8 (La.
Worthen v. DeLong 763 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Dixie Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. Pitre 751 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Capitol House v. PERRYMAN CONSULT., INC. 725 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
App. 5 Cir. 2/15/95), ; Wyatt, 651 So.2d at 361 .
Barbe v. AA Harmon & Co. 705 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Hughes v. Muckelroy 700 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Lafreniere Park v. Friends of Laf. Park 698 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
MAYNARD BATTURE VEN. v. Parish of Jefferson 694 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Sanders v. Zeagler 670 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
App. 5 Cir. 2/15/95), , the court explained that peremption does not extinguish a right when it has been exercised by the filing and service of an action.