Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Robinson, 654 So. 2d 682.

20 citing documents.

Amber L. Franklin v. Christopher B. Shotwell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
5/22/95), ], and reiterated in McKinley[ v. McKinley, 22-0132 (La.
Steven Marcus Kelley v. Jeannie Marie Kelley (Now Jenkins), Andrea Gail Kelley, and Hannah Grace Kelley La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
William M. McKinley v. Sheraunte' D. McKinley La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
5/ 22/ 95), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that, absent a biological relationship, an avowal is null.
Destany Schexnider Wetta v. David Wetta La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/22/95), Faucheaux v. Faucheaux, 00-20 (La.
Marcy Andre Barras v. Jason O'Rourke La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Succession of Mary Lou Thrasher La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Greenwood Community Center v. Calep 132 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
art. 1835; Succession of Robinson, 94-2229 (La.5/22/95), .
Maggie Sepulvado Manshack v. Mary Garcia Kershaw La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana in the Interest of A.L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/22/95), (acknowledgment in will by authentic act was in contravention of law and invalid if a biological relationship did not exist between decedent and the children).
State Ex Rel. Al 34 So. 3d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
App. 2 Cir. 1/19/94), (no legal effect to acknowledgment by stepfather on birth certificate, though he was given custody as a non-parent due to best interest of child); See also Succession of Robinson, 94-2229 (La.5/22/95), (acknowledgment in will by authentic act was in contravention of law and invalid if a biological relationship did not exist between decedent and the children).
State ex rel. A.L. 34 So. 3d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
2 Cir. 1/19/94), (no legal effect to acknowledgment by stepfather on birth certificate, though he was given custody as a non-parent due to best interest of child); See also Succession of Robinson, 94-2229 (La.5/22/95), (acknowledgment in will by authentic act was in contravention of law and invalid if a biological relationship did not exist between decedent and the children).
State In re T.A.S. 897 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
As noted by Louisiana Supreme Court in Succession of Robinson, 94-2229, p. 4 (La.5/22/95), , “[ajbsent a biological relationship, the avowal is null.
In Re TAS 897 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
As noted by Louisiana Supreme Court in Succession of Robinson, 94-2229, p. 4 (La.5/22/95), , "[a]bsent a biological relationship, the avowal is null.
Turner v. Busby 883 So. 2d 412 La. 2004
In Succession of Robinson, 94-2229 (La.5/22/95), , this court clearly and unequivocally held that the right to challenge an acknowledgment is granted by La.
Distinguished Turner v. Busby 859 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
The defendants rely heavily of Succession of Robinson, 94-2229 (La.5/22/95), to support their assertion that the trial court properly allowed DNA testing.
Hargrave v. Brown 783 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Succession of Robinson, 94-2229 (La.5/22/95), ; Sudwischer v. Estate of Hoffpauir, 91-0515 (La.10/31/91) .
Jones v. Rodrigue 771 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
(emphasis added) Furthermore, in Succession of Robinson, 94-2229, p. 4 (La.5/22/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court expressly stated that absent a biological relationship, an act of acknowledgment is null.
Faucheux v. Faucheux 772 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Succession of Robinson, 94-2229 (La.5/22/95), ; Roberts v. Franklin, 96-290 (La.App.
Rousseve v. Jones 704 So. 2d 229 La. 1997
Roberts v. Franklin 688 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
However, in Succession of Robinson, 94-2229 (La.5/22/95); , the court noted: Although art. 203 does not expressly preclude executing an acknowledgment where no biological relationship exists, this conclusion is self-evident and definitional of an acknowledgment.