Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Matter of RE, 645 So. 2d 205.

22 citing documents.

In Re_ Termination of Parental Rights to the Minor Child L.C.T La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
11/ 9/ 94), In re Applying for Private Adoption C.J.P., 54,460 ( La.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of Z.J. M.J. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
In Re: Applying for Private Adoption C.J.P. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
11/9/94), In re Adoption of B.G.S., 556 So.
Karen Cohen Kinnett Versus Jarred Brandon Kinnett La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
In re A.S. 181 So. 3d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Matter of R.E., 94-2657 (La.11/9/94), ; In re Adoption of S.C.D., 99-455 (La.App.
State in the Interest of A.A.M.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
In Re Aamb 62 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
In re R.E., 94-2657 (La.11/9/94), .
In the Interest of A.A.M.B. 62 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In re R.E., 94-2657 (La.11/9/94), .
State ex rel. B.E.M. 36 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1 Matter of R.E., 94-2657, p. 2 (La.11/9/94), , 207.
Suttle v. Easter 26 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State in the Matter of R.E., 94-2657 (La.11/9/94), ; citing Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248 , 103 S.Ct.
In Re McLarrin 865 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
94-2657, 94-2663 (La.11/9/94), ; In Re Adoption of S.C.D., 99-455 (La.App.
State ex rel. D. 806 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
the “adequate opportunity” to demonstrate his fitness as envisioned by In the Matter of R.E., 94-2657, 94-2596, 94-2663 (La.11/9/94), .
In Re Adoption of APC 776 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
As our supreme court stated in In the Matter of R.E., 94-2657 (La.11/9/94), , 207: [T]he statutes [Ch.C.
In re A.J.F. 764 So. 2d 47 La. 2000
See In the Matter of R.E., 94-2657 (La.11/9/94), , (citing Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248, 250, 261 , 103 S.Ct.
In Re AJF 764 So. 2d 47 La. 2000
See In the Matter of R.E., 94-2657 (La.11/9/94), , (citing Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248, 250, 261 , 103 S.Ct.
In Re HMM 754 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
In re H.M.M. 754 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
In Re Dantzler 739 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
In re R.E., 94-2657, 94-2596, 94-2663, p. 3 (La.11/9/94); , 207-08, citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 , 102 S.Ct.
In re de St. G. 705 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Our Supreme Court discussed the rights of an unwed father in as follows: In accordance with this court’s decision in In re Adoption of B.G.S., supra, the statutes contemplate that the unwed father’s constitutionally protected interest in a parent-child relationship does not come into existence until the father demonstrates his fitness for parental responsibilities, co
In Interest of ECB 691 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
In re M.F. 660 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
JjAs most recently stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State of Louisiana in the Matter of R.E., No. 94 CK 2663 (11/9/94), , “the burden of proof is upon the father to show the preservation of his opportunity to establish parental rights by proving these interrelated elements by a preponderance of the evidence.” Article 1137(B) states that relevant evidence may include proof of attempted legitimation of the child, formal acknowledgment of
In Re MF 660 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
As most recently stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State of Louisiana in the Matter of R.E., No. 94 CK 2663 (11/9/94), , "the burden of proof is upon the father to show the preservation of his opportunity to establish parental rights by proving these interrelated elements by a preponderance of the evidence."