Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Allen, 663 So. 2d 686.

25 citing documents.

State v. Parvez 249 So. 3d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Serigne 193 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Only when the defendant is “lulled into a misapprehension of the state’s case through the prosecution’s failure to disclose |s?timely or fully, and the defendant suffers prejudice,” ..., that basic unfairness results which constitutes reversible error., State v. Allen, ,94-2262 (La.11/13/95), .
State v. Clark 181 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), .
State v. Woodberry 171 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), .
State v. Cushenberry 146 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Allen, 94-2262, p. 4 (La.11/13/95), (citations omitted)....
State v. Johnson 135 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), .
State v. Campbell 86 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Harris, supra; State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), ; State v. Carter, 43,304 (La.App.2d Cir.6/18/08), , writ denied, 08-2752 (La.9/25/09), .
State of Louisiana v. Diwarn R. Bradford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
716- 729; State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95)
State Ex Rel. Th 52 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Cf. State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.1995), .
State ex rel. T.H. 52 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Cf. State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.1995), .
State v. Manning 15 So. 3d 1204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), .
State v. Thompson 12 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
716-729; State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), .
State v. Carter 987 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), .
State v. Smith 934 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
716-729; State v. Allen, 94-2262, p. 4 (La.1/13/95), ; State v. Donnaud, 04-624, pp. 7-8 (La.
State v. Persley 918 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Defendant cites State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), , which held that the state's failure to provide the names of witnesses to the defense was violative of the rules of discovery and constituted reversible error.
State v. Hight 810 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Allen, 94-2262, (La.11/13/95), (citations omitted).
State v. Malvoisin 779 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
See also State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), (defendant was charged with arson with intent to defraud occurring on May 2nd, and evidence of defendant’s attempt to torch his own house on May 1st was found to be integral part of crime charged); State v. Smith, 94-1502 (La.App.
State v. Lee 778 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Brazley, 97-2987, p. 2 (La.9/25/98), , quoting from State v. Allen, 94-2262, p. 4 (La.l 1/13/95), (citations omitted).
State v. Dennis 777 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), ; State v. Rainey, 722 So.2d at 1101 .
State v. Miskell 748 So. 2d 409 La. 1999
See State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), (purpose of criminal discovery rules).
State v. Rainey 722 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), .
State v. Brazley 721 So. 2d 841 La. 1998
State v. Allen, 94-2262, p. 4 (La.11/13/95), (citations omitted).
State v. Taylor 709 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), .
State v. Brazley 703 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), .
State v. Garner 694 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
In State v. Allen, 94-2262 (La.11/13/95), , the defendant was charged with arson with intent to defraud on 2 May, and evidence of the defendant’s attempt to torch his own house on 1 May was found to be an integral part of the crime charged.