DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 661 So. 2d 442.

983 citing documents.

  • State v. Harris 846 So. 2d 709 La. 2003
    The court *715 in which this Court discussed the issue of attempt.
  • State v. Simton 847 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Sanders 842 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Willis 843 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Kelley 836 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Hight 810 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Belcher 793 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Darbonne 787 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    [7] State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95); ; State v. Williams, 98-1146 (La.
  • State v. Murphy 785 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Furgerson 781 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    This court does not assess credibility or re-weigh evidence, State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), ; State v. Adams, 30,815 (La.App.2d Cir.6/24/98), , and in the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness's testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient to support the requisite factual finding.
  • State v. Goodley 774 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    App. 3 Cir. 11/9/94); , reversed on other grounds, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95); (La.App.
  • State v. Stevens 766 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96), ; State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Thompson 758 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96), ; State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. McDonald 754 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Fuller 759 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Rose 750 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Const, art. 5, § 10; State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Bradford 745 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96), ( Jackson standard does not provide the appellate court with a vehicle to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder); State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95)
  • State v. Louis 744 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Caldwell 742 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Thomas 747 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Knight 738 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Williams 738 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Mickens 731 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Lewis 732 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95)
  • State v. Adkins 721 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    *1093 State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Adams 715 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Jarvis 710 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Hubbard 711 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. *396 Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Banks 699 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95); ; (La.App.
  • State v. Anderson 697 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Hollis 688 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    the Supreme Court discussed the issue of attempt: In determining whether the action of a defendant is an attempt, the totality of the facts and circumstances presented by each case must be evaluated.