DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Strickland, 683 So. 2d 218.

139 citing documents.

  • State v. Willis 823 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    art. 712; State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), .
  • State v. Plaisance 811 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), .
  • State v. Burbank 811 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 51-52 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 55 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
    [36] State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), -239 (remand for a hearing on whether it was strategy or dereliction for counsel to omit opening and closing statements, fail to investigate and present mitigating evidence, and prepare witnesses); (remanding for a hearing to determine if Brady material was suppressed an
  • State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    art. 712; State v. Strickland, 94-0025, p. 23 (La.11/1/96), ; overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Goins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 800 So. 2d 783 La. 2001
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025, p. 19 (La.11/1/96), .
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 51-52 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 55 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 51-52 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 55 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Kahey, supra ; State v. Lane, supra .
  • State v. Ste. Marie 801 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), .
  • State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
    See State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 13-14 (La.11/1/96), (holding that harmless error standard of review applies to a prejudicial joinder claim on appeal and reviewing court should not reverse unless the error affected the substantial rights of the defendant at trial).
  • State v. Debrow 781 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), .
  • State v. Harris 781 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 51-52 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 55 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State v. Johnson 778 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Kahey, supra ; State v. Lane, supra .
  • State ex rel B.M. 774 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    art. 712; State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), .
  • State v. Davenport 771 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/01/96), ; Wesley, supra .
  • State v. Day 762 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State v. Wesley 759 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Kahey, supra ; State v. Lane, supra .
  • State v. Hotoph 750 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), .
  • State v. Lucky 755 So. 2d 845 La. 1999
    [5] State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 48-49 (La.11/1/96), .
  • State v. Simmons 738 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    See State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), .
  • State v. Wessinger 736 So. 2d 162 La. 1999
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), .
  • State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
    art. 712; State v. Strickland, 94-0025, p. 23 (La.11/1/96), ; (La.
  • State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), ; (La.
  • State v. Rochon 733 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    See State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), , and the cases cited therein.
  • State v. Reyes 726 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), .
  • State v. Brumfield 737 So. 2d 660 La. 1998
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 48-49 (La.11/1/96); ("[T]his Court has determined that the lack of a standard actually gives defendants an advantage by allowing jurors to consider any amount of mitigating evidence in their determination.").
  • State v. Calloway 718 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    See also State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), .
  • State v. Lisotta 712 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    the Louisiana Supreme Court said that if the defense has prior notice of the state's intent to introduce a statement and the statement is properly admitted later, the prosecutor's premature mention of the statement in its opening statement to the jury causes no prejudice.
  • State v. Johnson 706 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Evans, 94-2209 (La.App.
  • State v. Ross 704 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Evans, 94-2209 (La.App.
  • State v. Campbell 703 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Winfrey 703 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Bullard 700 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), .
  • State v. Barnett 700 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Hamilton 699 So. 2d 29 La. 1997
    See, State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96); .
  • State v. Anthony 695 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    at 1566 ; See also State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96); .
  • State ex rel. Lewis v. State 693 So. 2d 781 La. 1997
  • State v. Rowan 694 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025 (La.11/1/96), -235 ; Marshall, 660 So.2d at 825 .