Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ward, 670 So. 2d 562.

21 citing documents.

State v. Williams 96 So. 3d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 2/29/96), ( (La.App.
State v. Baylor 998 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 2/29/96) , , writ denied, 97-642 (La.9/19/97), .
State v. Shaw 969 So. 2d 1233 La. 2007
4 Cir. 2/29/96) , -569 , writ denied, 97-0642 (La.9/19/97), (Defendant's multiple convictions which arose out of three separate and distinct criminal episodes on different dates and against three different victims could all be enhanced even though the convictions were obtained on the same date.); with State v. Francis
State v. Galle 904 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Davis 859 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 2/29/96) , , this Court discussed the evolution of the rule articulated in Porter and stated that "[u]nder Porter, the new general rule is that the trial court can multiple bill convictions rendered on the same day."
State v. Phillips 834 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Explained State v. Jackson 828 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 2/29/96) , , extensively outlined the jurisprudential transformation of the “one day, one conviction” rule into an “one event, one day, one conviction” rule.
State v. Lee 826 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Porche 819 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 2/29/96), -68 , citing State ex rel.
State v. Wilson 803 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Daniels 773 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 2/29/96) , , writ denied, 97-0642 (La.9/19/97), , and vacated his multiple offender sentence.
State v. Hawthorne 772 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 2/29/96) , , writ denied, 97-0642 (La.9/19/97), , this Court presented a thorough clarification concerning when a defendant with prior convictions and multiple current offenses can be multiple billed on more than one conviction.
State v. Newman 769 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4th Cir.2/29/96), , writ denied, 97-0642 (La.9/19/97), .
State v. Derouselle 769 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 2/29/96) , ; (La.App.
State v. Lee 764 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4th Cir.2/29/96), , writ denied, 97-0642 (La.9/19/97), .
State v. Harris 761 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 2/29/96) , , writ denied 97-0642 (La.9/19/97), FIRST PRO SE ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR: Defendant contends that he did not receive a fair trial in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
State v. Lawrence 752 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4th Cir.2/29/96), -69 , writ denied, 97-0642 (La.9/19/97), .
State v. Warren 742 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
4th Cir. 2/29/96), , writ denied, 97-0642 (La.9/19/97), , for the proposition that multiple convictions arising out of the same criminal act or episode and obtained on the same date are considered a “single conviction” for purposes of the multiple offender law.
State v. Jones 731 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 2/29/96), , writ denied, 97-0642 (La.9/19/97), .
State v. Bentley 728 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
4 Cir. 2/29/96), , writ denied, 97-0642 (La.9/19/97), ; State v. McKinney, 93-1425, pp. 8-9 (La.App.
State v. Kennerson 695 So. 2d 1367 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
4 Cir. 2/29/96) ; , 568-69: Thus under the Supreme Court's most recent pronouncement in State ex rel.