DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 648 So. 2d 872.

44 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Dominick Sims 195 So. 3d 441 La. 2016
  • State v. Frith 151 So. 3d 946 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Prejean v. Barousse, 2012-1177 (La.1/29/13), -72 ; City of New Orleans v. Louisiana Assessors’ Retirement and Relief Fund, 2005-2548 (La.10/1/07), ; State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), (citing United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 , 107 S.Ct.
  • State v. Eberhardt 145 So. 3d 377 La. 2014
    Prejean v. Barousse, 2012-1177 (La.1/29/13), -72 ; City of New Orleans v. Louisiana Assessors’ Retirement and Relief Fund, 2005-2548 (La.10/1/07), ; State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), (citing United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 , 107 S.Ct.
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JAMAL C. TAYLOR AND KELIN A. STEVENS (Parish of Jefferson) STATE OF LOUISIANA v. … La. 2014
    1/17/95), (citing United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745, 107 S.Ct.
  • State v. Webb 144 So. 3d 971 La. 2014
    See Draughter, 13-0914 at 14, 130 So.3d at 866 (noting “[A] person may not challenge [a] statute on the ground that it may conceivably be applied unconstitutionally to others in situations not before the court.”); see also State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.01/17/95), (a party bringing a facial challenge “must establish that no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid”).
  • State v. Smith 144 So. 3d 867 La. 2014
    State v. Brown, 94-1290, pp. 10-11 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Prejean v. Barousse 107 So. 3d 569 La. 2013
    City of New Orleans v. Louisiana Assessors Retirement and Relief Fund, 05-2548, p. 23 (La.10/1/07), ; State v. Brown, 94-1290, p. 5 (La.1/17/95), (citing United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 , 107 S.Ct.
  • Rhone v. Ward 31 So. 3d 591 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    700 , 38 L.Ed.2d 618 (1974); State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), .
  • State of Louisiana v. D.R.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95)
  • State v. HB 955 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), .
  • State of Louisiana v. H.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. H.B. 955 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Hite v. Larpenter 923 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Regarding Hite’s argument that she is being denied equal protection of the law by imposing on her a higher burden of proof, we note that among other things, “[t]he state and federal constitutional guarantees of equal protection mandate that state laws affect alike all persons and interests similarly situated.” State v. Brown, 94-1290, p. 6 (La.1/17/95), .
  • State v. Green 890 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), .
  • State v. Day 838 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), , State v. Dubroc, 99-730 (La.App.
  • State v. Rutland 829 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Brown, 94-1290, p. 9 (La.1/17/95), .
  • State v. Sullivan 827 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    State v. Brown, 94-1290, p. 9 (La.1/17/95), .
  • State v. Williams 822 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    [15] State v. Brown, 94-1290, pp. 6-8 (La.1/17/95), -877 .
  • State v. Holmes 811 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In State v. Brown, 94-1290, p. 5 (La.1/17/95), , the defendants argued that La.
  • State v. Weaver 805 So. 2d 166 La. 2002
    700, 704 , 38 L.Ed.2d 618 (1974); State v. Brown, 94-1290, p. 6 (La.1/17/95), .
  • State v. Graves 798 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95); ; State v. Dubroc, 99-730 (La.
  • State v. McCraney 798 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), , reh'g denied, 1995 Lexis 757 (La.3/23/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court sustained the statute as constitutional.
  • State v. Richardson 790 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    [8] State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), ; State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Norwood 789 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), ; State v. Flores, 27,736 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), .
  • State v. Dennis 777 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    examined the application of the overbreadth doctrine and found that: In order for the principle of overbreadth to apply, a constitutionally protected right must be claimed as a defense.
  • State v. Schmidt 771 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95); ; State v. Dubroc, 99-730 (La.App.
  • State v. Guzman 769 So. 2d 1158 La. 2000
    State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), .
  • State v. Johnson 759 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    App.2d Cir.2/28/96), ; State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), .
  • State v. Williams 729 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Brown, 94-1290, pp. 6-7 (La.1/17/95); .
  • State v. Hennis 734 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Brown, 94-1290, p. 6 (La.1/17/95); .
  • State v. Crawford 727 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    [3] State v. Brown , 94-1290 at p. 5 (La.1/17/95), .
  • State ex rel. Stewart v. Stewart 723 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • Revere v. Canulette 715 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Devers v. Southern University 712 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    2095, 2100 , 95 L.Ed.2d 697 (1987); State v. Brown, 94-1290, p. 5 (La.1/17/95); .
  • State v. Shirah 702 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    State v. Powdrill, 95-2307 (La.11/25/96), ; State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), , citing United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 , 107 S.Ct.
  • State v. Wade 693 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Whitt 684 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), ; State v. Flores, supra.
  • State v. Powdrill 684 So. 2d 350 La. 1996
    citing United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 , 107 S.Ct.
  • State v. Steward 681 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    State v. Brown, 94-1290, p. 5 (La.1/17/95); .
  • State v. Sandifer 679 So. 2d 1324 La. 1996
  • State v. Flores 669 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Clark 670 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Williams 661 So. 2d 445 La. 1995
    1/17/95), explained the ambit of the equal protection clause: The state and federal constitutional guarantees of equal protection mandate that state laws affect alike all persons and interests similarly situated.
  • State v. Baxley 656 So. 2d 973 La. 1995
    1/17/95); -78 ; Goode, 380 So.2d at 1363 .