Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 649 So. 2d 1078.

81 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. William Gary Ryder La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    4th Cir.1/19/95), (“It is no longer true that whatever forms part of the res gestae is admissible, and such evidence remains subject to the [art. 403] balancing test.”); 1 McCormick on Evidence, supra, § 190, p. BOD, n. 12 (“It seems preferable to say that this evidence of ‘intertwined’ crimes may be admit
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Dupart La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
  • State v. Miguel 211 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Candebat 133 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Chaplain 114 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Sanders 104 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 1/19/95) , (possession of gun and purse-snatching incident were integral part of act or transaction for which defendant was tried as events were very close in time, and the state could not have Inaccurately or logically presented its case without showing how and why defendant was arrested and cocaine found).
  • State of Louisiana v. Robera Cartrell Milo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. MARZETT 40 So. 3d 1204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
  • State v. Davis 30 So. 3d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir.1/19/95), (“It is no longer true that whatever forms part of the res gestae is admissible, and such evidence remains subject to the [art. 403] balancing test.”).
  • State v. Lawrence 6 So. 3d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Lala 1 So. 3d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State ex rel. B.C. 991 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State Ex Rel. Bc 991 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. James 980 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Phillips 853 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 1/19/95); , citing Authors' Note to Article 404(B), Handbook on Louisiana Evidence Law, Pugh, Force, Rault, and Triche (1994 ed.).
  • State v. Joseph 854 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 1/19/95); , citing Authors' Note to Article 404(B), Handbook on Louisiana Evidence Law, Pugh, Force, Rault, and Triche (1994 ed.).
  • State v. Francois 844 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Comena 843 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Wade 832 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Sims 823 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Legett 819 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Brown 804 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Clark 803 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Harris 800 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Briley 798 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Marino 804 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Derouen 790 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Howard 787 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Hebert 787 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    App. 4 Cir. 1/19/95), ; La.
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Julian 785 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Rodriguez 781 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Washington 778 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Malvoisin 779 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 1/19/95) , (evidence of purse snatching by defendant which precipitated chase and capture of defendant was admissible as integral part of 17charges of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, where gun and cocaine were found on defendant’s person when officers apprehend
  • State v. Francois 778 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Campbell 778 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Robinson 772 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Jones 773 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Lipscomb 770 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.1/19/95), ("It is no longer true that whatever forms part of the res gestae is admissible, and such evidence remains subject to the [art. 403] balancing test."); 1 McCormick on Evidence, supra, § 190, p. BOD, n. 12 ("It seems preferable to say that this evidence of `intertwined' crimes may be admitted, since it does not r
  • State v. Hughes 765 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Watson 763 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Gibson 761 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 1/19/95); , this court set forth the standard for evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence to support a defendant's conviction when it stated: The standard for reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecutor, a rational trier of fact could h
  • State v. Patterson 758 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Tyler 759 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Williams 762 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Fortier 756 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. McGee 752 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999