Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Young, 663 So. 2d 525.

199 citing documents.

  • State v. King 804 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 10/26/95) , (Plotkin, J., concurring)).
  • State v. Brown 788 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 10/26/95) , , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Williams 788 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Hebert 787 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 10/26/95) , (Plotkin, J., concurring)) [6] In making this determination, we held that "while a defendant's record of nonviolent offenses may play a role in a sentencing judge's determination that a minimum sentence is too long, it cannot be the only reason, or even the major reason, for declaring such a sentence excessive."
  • State v. Flowers 782 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 10/26/95) , (J. Plotkin concurring), the Court stated: To rebut the presumption that the mandatory minimum sentence is constitutional, the defendant must clearly and convincingly show that: [he] is exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances, the defendant is a victim of the legislature’s f
  • State v. Harrison 782 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 10/26/95) , (J. Plotkin concurring), writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), the court stated: | ¿To rebut the presumption that the mandatory minimum sentence is constitutional, the defendant must clearly and convincingly show that: [he] is exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstan
  • State v. Chairs 780 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 10/26/95) , , writ denied 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Briscoe 779 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010, (La.
  • State v. Durant 776 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 10/26/95) , , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Smith 777 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Simmons 779 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 10/26/95), (Plotkin, J., concurring))).
  • State v. Jason 779 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Green 779 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    App. 4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Baker 776 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir.10/26/95), , our brethren observed that: One of the basic principles universally applied by courts in testing constitutionality is the presumption of constitutionality.
  • State v. Carter 773 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Scott 769 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), ].
  • State v. Smith 769 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Calhoun 776 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Lindsey 770 So. 2d 339 La. 2000
    App. 4 Cir. 10/26/95), (Plotkin, J., concurring)).
  • State v. Dillion 770 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Henderson 762 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Johnson, 97-1906 at p. 8, 709 So.2d at 676 , quoting State v. Young, 94-1636, pp. 5-6, (Plotkin, J., concurring.).
  • State v. Alford 765 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Lee 764 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    App. 4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Bazile 762 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4th Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Smith 760 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 10/26/95) , , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), , the appellate court stated: One of the basic principles universally applied by courts in testing constitutionality is the presumption of constitutionality.
  • State v. Bazile 757 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 10/26/95) , , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Stevenson 757 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), (Plotkin, J., concurring).
  • State v. Armstrong 756 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    App. 4th Cir. 10/26/95), .
  • State v. Carthan 765 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 10/26/95) ; , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96); ].
  • State v. Windham 748 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    4th Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), ).
  • State v. Martello 748 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Carter 746 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Warren 742 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Burton 746 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), (Plotkin, J., concurring) (the defendant must show that he is "exceptional ...
  • State v. Long 744 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Ditcharo 739 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Hayes 739 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4th Cir.10/26/95); , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96); ].
  • State v. Hannon 736 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. *328 10/26/95) , , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Finch 730 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Short 725 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Jackson 718 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Francis 715 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    App. 4 Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Johnson 709 So. 2d 672 La. 1998
    App. 4th Cir. 10/26/95), .
  • State v. Bell 709 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    4 Cir. 10/26/95) , , our brethren observed that: One of the basic principles universally applied by courts in testing constitutionality is the presumption of constitutionality.
  • State v. Moses 701 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    4th Cir. 10/26/95); -528 , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96); : One of the basic principles universally applied by courts in testing constitutionality is the presumption of constitutionality.
  • State v. Lee 699 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    4th Cir. 10/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Lacoste 695 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    4 Cir. 10/26/95) , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), , the trial court sentenced the defendant to 30 years at hard labor rather than the mandatory minimum sentence of ninety-nine and one-half years prescribed by the Habitual Offender Law.
  • State v. Bastian 681 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    4 Cir.10/26/95), ; State v. Eggerson, 95-1337 (La.App.
  • State v. Morgan 673 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    4th Cir. 10/26/95), , the trial court stated: I'm going to depart from the mandatory minimum sentence, which would be 99 years to life.