DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Troulliet, 643 So. 2d 1267.

20 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Elvin D. Villafranca La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    App. 5 Cir. 9/14/94); (citing Foy, supra).
  • State v. Luckey 212 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    5 Cir. 9/14/94) , ( (La.
  • State v. Chester 165 So. 3d 1006 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • Jones v. Chatelain 148 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5th Cir.9/14/94), -71 ; -69 (La.App.
  • State in the Interest of N. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State ex rel. N.F. 124 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Triston T. Lyons La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Deutor 842 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Helton 828 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    5 Cir. 11/25/97) , ; (La.App.
  • State v. Ledesma 817 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Clemons 811 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    5 Cir. 9/14/94) , , explained that "a brief reference to post-Miranda silence does not mandate a mistrial or reversal where the trial as a whole was fairly conducted, the proof of guilt is strong, and the state made no use of the silence for impeachment."
  • State v. Gaal 800 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 9/14/94) , this Court discussed the issue of competency, within the context of a child sexual abuse case: The law regarding the competency of a witness is quite clear.
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    5th Cir.9/14/94), , has explained the limits on references to a defendant’s post-arrest silence as follows: The United States Supreme Court has held that, because an accused’s post-arrest silence is “insolubly ambiguous” and a jury is apt to draw inappropriate inferences from the fact that a defendant chose to remain silent, “the use f
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5th Cir.9/14/94), , has explained the limits on references to a defendant's post-arrest silence as follows: The United States Supreme Court has held that, because an accused's post-arrest silence is "insolubly ambiguous" and a jury is apt to draw inappropriate inferences from the fact that a defendant chose to remain silent, "the use f
  • State v. Grant 761 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    5 Cir.11/25/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Vasquez 729 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5 Cir. 9/14/94) , ; (La.App.
  • State v. Cedrington 725 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Atkins 713 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Campbell 703 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State in Interest of CW v. Womack 669 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996