Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Conrad, 646 So. 2d 1062.

31 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Curtis Cheley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5 Cir. 11/16/94), writ denied, 94-3076 (La.
State v. Cheley 270 So. 3d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
5 Cir. 11/16/94), , 1064, writ denied , 94-3076 (La.
State v. Stanfield 137 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Chaplain 114 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Proctor 80 So. 3d 527 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Causey 67 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 11/16/94), , as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. Dauzart 960 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Guillard 902 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 11/16/94) , , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Francois 884 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
State v. Muhammad 857 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Perkins 811 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5th Cir.11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 11/16/94) , , as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. Morris 798 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5th Cir.11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), ; [12] LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Anderson 788 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 11/16/94) , , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Johnson 783 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Mayo 770 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
5 Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), , set out the procedure for determining the burden of proof in a multiple offender hearing: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was re
State v. Dunn 769 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
5 Cir. 11/16/94) , , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), , as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. Breaux 767 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
5th Cir. *912 11/16/94), , writs denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Simmons 767 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
5 Cir. 11/16/94) , , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), , for burdens of proof in habitual offender proceedings: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence
State v. Perkins 762 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
5th Cir. 11/16/94), ; writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95)
State v. Ballay 757 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
App. 5 Cir. 11/16/94), -1064 , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. Perkins 751 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
App. 5 Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), , for burdens of proof in habitual offender proceedings: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence
State v. Jordon 732 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
App. 5th Cir.11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. Richmond 734 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
App. 5th Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Richmond 734 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
App. 5th Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Williams 729 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. DeSalvo 721 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Carter 712 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
App. 5 Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), , [4] , this Court summarized the burdens of proof during a multiple offender proceeding as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the exist
State v. Windham 712 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), this court noted the following where the predicate conviction is obtained pursuant to a plea of guilty: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defe
State v. Scamardo 708 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 11/16/94) , , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), , as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. Winfrey 703 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
5th Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.