Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cousan, 684 So. 2d 382.

110 citing documents.

State v. Murray 161 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Allen, 41,548 (La.App.2d Cir.11/15/06), , writ denied, 07-0530 (La.12/7/07), , citing State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), .
State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
State v. Mills 153 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
11/25/96), -89 , both of which require that a defendant lodge a contemporaneous objection to the trial court's ruling in order to assign as error the trial court's refusal to sustain his challenge for cause.
State v. Weathersby 140 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 9/28/11), (citing State v. Cousan, 94-2503, p. 13 (La.11/25/96), ).
State v. Nellum 136 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 9/28/11), (citing State v. Cousan, 94-2503, p. 13 (La.11/25/96), ).
State v. Wiggins 139 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), -93 ; see also La.
State v. Coleman 133 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Cousan, 94-2503, p. 13 (La.11/25/96), ; State v. Sartain, 2008-0266, p. 27 (La.App.
State v. Draughter 130 So. 3d 855 La. 2013
State v. Cousan, 1994-2503, p. 17 (La.11/25/96); -393 .
State v. Dunn 119 So. 3d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Cousan, 94-2503, p. 13 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Petitto 116 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Brown 115 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Cousan, 94-2503, p. 10 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Galle 107 So. 3d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Cousan, 94-2503, p. 13 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Cooks 81 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
11/25/96), ; State v. Sartain, 2008-0266, p. 27 (La.App.
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Cousan, 94-2503, p. 13 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
the potential juror expresses an ability to disregard that opinion and render a verdict according to the law and evidence.” State v. Cousan, 94-2503, pp. 11-12 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Harrison 69 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Sparks 68 So. 3d 435 La. 2011
Stat. 15:451; State v. Cousan, 94-2503, p. 5 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. LANDOR 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Claiborne 17 So. 3d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Bridgewater 11 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Lewis 16 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Cousan, 94-2503, p. 13 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Landry 15 So. 3d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Cousan, 94-2503, p. 13 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Landry 5 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Sartain 2 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), ; Williams.
State v. Colbert 990 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), ; Williams.
State v. Nix 987 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Williams, supra; State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Rowell 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Turnage 978 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Lizotte 977 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. McGeorge 977 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Ross 973 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
102 , 163 L.Ed.2d 116 (2005);, State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. LANUS 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Ross 965 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
In State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), , the court ruled that the defendant's statement to police was voluntary, even if they did not tell him that the officer had died and that defendant was a suspect in his murder.
State v. Harrell 965 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), ; Williams, supra .
State v. Hill 956 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Harris, 2001-2730 (La.1/19/05), ; State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
11/25/96), -7 (failure of the police to inform a suspect of the subject matter of interrogation "is certainly a relevant factor in reviewing the totality of the circumstances under which defendant made the incriminating remarks."); cf. La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Allen 942 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), .
Malone v. Shyne 937 So. 2d 343 La. 2006
[2] See also State v. Jones, 94-0459 (La.7/5/94), (superceded by constitutional amendment on other grounds as stated in State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), ) ("except for requests for reprieve, the governor can only act on requests for clemency upon recommendation made by the pardon board").
State v. Williams 925 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Jones 891 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
State v. Cousan, 94-2503, p. 13 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Bozeman 866 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), .
SG v. City of Monroe 843 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
5th Cir.2/9/94), ; State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), ; La.
State v. Robinson 820 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Cousan, 94-2503, p. 13 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Plaisance 811 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Johnson 812 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[34] State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), -392 .
State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
State v. Mitchell, 94-2078, p. 6 (La.5/21/96), ; State v. Cousan, 94-2503, pp. 15-16 (La.11/25/96), -92 .
Schmidt v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield 769 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
5th Cir.2/9/94), ; State v. Cousan, 94-2503 (La.11/25/96), ; La.
State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Cousan, 94-2503, p. 13 (La.11/25/96), .
State v. Lucky 755 So. 2d 845 La. 1999
while this court has consistently applied Taylor to all unobjected-to guilt phase errors, whether or not they may have an impact on the sentencing hearing, see State v. Cousan, 94-2503, pp. 4-5 n. 1, (La.11/25/96), , 386 n. 1, we nevertheless choose to discuss this error for purposes of future collateral review.