Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Henderson, 648 So. 2d 974.

18 citing documents.

State v. Thompson 202 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Harris 66 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/14/94), , this Court, citing Bordenkircher , rejected the defendant’s claim that his sentence was vindictive.
State v. Lee 15 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/14/94), , this Court, citing Bordenkircher , rejected the defendant’s claim that his sentence was vindictive.
State v. HARMASON 996 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
App. 5 Cir. 12/14/94), , address the issue of the trial court's failure to vacate the underlying sentence that was imposed prior to sentencing the defendant as a habitual offender.
State v. Esteen 821 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
App. 5th Cir.12/14/94), .
State v. Tyler 815 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 12/14/94) , , held that an eighteen year sentence imposed on a defendant who rejected the state's plea bargain offers was not vindictive.
State v. Aleman 809 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 12/14/94) , , this Court held that an eighteen-year habitual offender sentence, imposed on the defendant after he chose not to accept plea bargains offering sentences of six and onehalf years on an underlying burglary offense and fifteen years on the habitual offender bill, of information, was not vindictive.
State v. Bell 781 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 12/14/94) , , however, this Court distinguished Jones and held that where the record is sufficient to determine that the State's evidence was restricted to one prior felony and that the trial judge's finding of habitual offender status could only relate to a second offense, there is no need to remand the case for rehearing of the
State v. Luna 772 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Jordan 774 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Brooks 769 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Walton 738 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
5 Cir. 12/14/94) , ; (La.App.
State v. Rainey 722 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
App. 5 Cir. 12/14/96), .
State v. Ayche 717 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. McCorkle 708 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Carter 685 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Jackson 665 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
5 Cir. 12/14/94) , ; (La.App.
State v. Perry 657 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
App. 5 Cir. 12/14/94), , the court distinguished Jones and held that where the record is sufficient to determine that the state’s evidence was restricted to one prior felony and the trial judge’s finding of habitual offender status can only relate to a second offense, there is no need to remand the case for rehearing of the habitual offende