Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bond, 650 So. 2d 354.

14 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Ryk Frickey La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State v. Burbank 971 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 1/31/95) , , this Court affirmed a trial court ruling denying a defendant a continuance requested on the day of trial to replace appointed counsel with retained counsel.
State v. Jackson 889 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 1/31/95) , -359 , this court concluded the defendant was not entitled to a continuance to be represented by an attorney defendant had just contacted.
State v. Robertson 864 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Ormond 786 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Bond, 94-509 (La App. 5 Cir. 1/31/95), .
State v. Luna 772 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Post 729 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Zapata 713 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5th Cir. 1/31/95), -359 , in which we concluded the defendant was not entitled to a continuance because his appointed attorney had filed several pretrial motions on his behalf and had stated, on the day of trial, that he was ready to proceed.
State v. Treadway 710 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Guccione 694 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Price 690 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Batiste 687 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
5 Cir. *504 1/31/95); , both examples of defendants who refused to be represented by court appointed counsel, and who, by their actions and inactions, impliedly waived their right to counsel.
State v. Mitchell 680 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
5th Cir. 1/31/95), , the defendant sought a continuance on the day of trial so that he could replace his appointed counsel with another attorney.
State v. Fritcher 672 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
5th Cir. 1/31/95); ; (La.App.