Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. James, 656 So. 2d 746.

18 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Erick Gail Gragg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. El Jerico Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5 Cir. 5/30/95), (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. A.D. L La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 5/30/95), (James I), was very similar 4 to the current case.
State v. A.D.L. 92 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , (James I), was very similar |fito the current case.
State v. Davis 942 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Armant 839 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , , however, this Court took a different approach regarding the absence of a jury trial waiver.
State v. Vortisch 763 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
5th Cir. 5/30/95), , this Court, with one judge dissenting, remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to trial by jury.
State v. James 751 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Pierre 733 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5 Cir.5/30/95), , State v. Brual, 98-657 (La.App.
State v. Herrera 729 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 5/30/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court appears to have sanctioned the procedure of remanding to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether a valid jury waiver was obtained.
State v. Brual 726 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Westmoreland 721 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , , this court, with one judge dissenting, remanded the case for an eviden-tiary hearing to determine whether the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to trial by jury.
State v. Thomas 720 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/30/95) ; , in which the majority chose to remand for a similar evidentiary hearing.
State v. Stoltz 717 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , , this court, with one judge dissenting, remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to trial by jury.
State v. Clark 711 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/30/95) ; , in which the majority chose to remand for a similar evidentiary hearing.
State v. Arnold 706 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
5th Cir. 5/30/95), , wherein the majority elected to remand a case for an evidentiary hearing.
State v. Mandigo 702 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
5th Cir. *357 5/30/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Nanlal 701 So. 2d 963 La. 1997
5th Cir. 5/30/95), ; (La.App.