Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Benton, Benton & Benton v. LA PUB. FACILITIES AUTH., 672 So. 2d 720.

14 citing documents.

Cynthia Morales v. Alonzo Wilder; Dr. Stephen McCulloh; Cheryl Smith; Lauren Milton; Karlie Vikowski; Other Unknown Livingston Parish … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
App. 1 Cir. 4/ 4/ 96), writ denied, 96- 1445 ( La.
Bihm v. Deca Systems, Inc. 226 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 1 Cir. 4/4/96), , writ denied, 96-1445 (La.
Raj v. Louisiana State University 167 So. 3d 1023 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1st Cir.4/4/96), -23 , writ denied, 96-1445 (La.9/13/96), .
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University v. Dixie Brewing Co. 154 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1 Cir. 4/4/96), (noting that “[u]nder federal law, res judicata does not apply unless the party claimed to be barred had a 'full and fair opportunity' to litigate the claim in the first action”); see also James Wm.
Miller v. Conagra, Inc. 991 So. 2d 445 La. 2008
1 Cir. 4/4/96) , , cases which found 51:1409(E) to be peremptive, but nonetheless found the period had not begun to run where the defendant continued to violate the statute.
Gary L. Miller v. Conagra, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1 Cir. 4/4/96), writ denied, 96-1445 (La.
Miller v. ConAgra, Inc. 970 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1 Cir. 4/4/96) , , writ denied, 96-1445 (La.9/13/96), , (La.App.
Glod v. Baker 899 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 4/4/96) , , writ denied, 96-1445 (La.9/13/96), , held that LUTPA's peremptive period cannot begin to run as long as violations of LUTPA continue.
Walter A. Glod, Jr., M.D. v. W. Gregory Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 4/4/96), writ denied, 96- 9 1445 (La.
Vines v. Northeast Louisiana University 839 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
1st Cir.4/4/96), , writ denied, 96-1445 (La.9/13/96), .
Samour v. Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc. 818 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
1 Cir. 4/4/96) , , writ denied, 96-1445 (La.9/13/96), , this court applied Reeder, stating that in order for res judicata to bar pendent state claims in a subsequent state law proceeding three requirements must be met.
CAPITOL HOUSE PRESERVATION v. Perryman 745 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1st Cir.4/4/96), , writ denied, 96-1445 (La.9/13/96), .
McCollough v. Dauzat 736 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
App. 1 Cir. 4/4/96); , writ denied, 96-1445 (La.9/13/96); ; de la Vergne v. de Lamaze, 95-1866 *916 (La.App.
Gilbert v. Visone 708 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
1st Cir. 4/4/96), , writ denied.