Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Broussard v. Stack, 680 So. 2d 771.

21 citing documents.

David Gniady v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 1 Cir. 9/27/96), -81).
Calvin Guidry and Denise Guidry v. USAgencies Casualty Insurance Company, Inc., Patricia Mousseau, Glenn Mousseau, Venture Transport Logistics, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 1 st Cir. 9/ 27/ 96), - 780.
Rentrop v. Arch Ins. Co. 241 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 1 Cir. 9/27/96), , 779-780.
Arthur L. Gibson, Jr. v. Louisiana Rice Mill, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
1 Cir. 9/27/96), -80 (citations omitted).
Roland Lee Lewis v. Proline Systems, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Lewis v. Proline Systems, Inc. 117 So. 3d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Marroy v. Hertzak 77 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Elsa Gajewsky v. John T. Ning, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1 Cir. 9/27/96); -81 (citations omitted), the court considered the standards of appellate review for the denial of a motion for JNOV, grant of a motion for JNOV, and denial of a motion for new trial, holding: In ruling on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) under L
Gajewsky v. Ning 997 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1 Cir. 9/27/96) ; -81 (citations omitted), the court considered the standards of appellate review for the denial of a motion for JNOV, grant of a motion for JNOV, and denial of a motion for new trial, holding: In ruling on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) under LSA C.C.P.
Cavalier v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 994 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1 Cir. 9/27/96), -780 ; Lilly v. Allstate Ins.
Cavalier v. STATE, EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 994 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1 Cir. 9/27/96) , -780 ; Lilly v. Allstate Ins.
Rideau v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 970 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
McLin v. Breaux 950 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Maria E. Palacios v. Louisiana & Delta Railroad, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1 Cir. 9/27/96); -81 (citations omitted), the court considered the standards of appellate review for the denial of a motion for JNOV, grant of a motion for JNOV, and denial of a motion for new trial, holding: In ruling on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) under LS
Hunter v. State Ex Rel. LSU Medical School 934 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
1st Cir.9/27/96), -780 .
Paul M. Arceneaux v. Roy De La Rosa La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Arceneaux v. Rosa 889 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Bertrand v. Air Logistics, Inc. 820 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
1 Cir. 9/27/96) ; , *1237 779-80 (citations omitted), the court considered the standards of appellate review for the grant or denial of a motion for JNOV, holding: In ruling on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) under LSAC.C.P.
Darbone v. State 815 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
1 Cir. 9/27/96) ; -81 (citations omitted), the court considered the standards of appellate review for the denial of a motion for JNOV, grant of a motion for JNOV, and denial of a motion for new trial, holding: In ruling on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) under LSA C.C.P.
Clelland v. Haas 774 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
1st Cir.9/27/96), , for a comparison of the standards of review that must be overcome to reverse the denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and new trial with the standard of review applied to a jury's determination of whether a breach in the standard of care existed.
Diez v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 709 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by