Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Huls, 676 So. 2d 160.

33 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Viusqui J. Perez-Espinosa La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    App. 1 Cir. 5/29/96), writ denied, 96-1734 (La.
  • State v. Gross 218 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    1 Cir. 5/29/96) , , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.
  • State v. Eley 203 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    App. 1st Cir. 5/29/96), , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. William Shupp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    1 Cir. 5/29/96), writ denied, 96-1734 (La.
  • State v. Shupp 185 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    1 Cir. 5/29/96) , , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97), , this court noted: Disclosure of favorable evidence by the state must be made at such a time as to allow the defense to use the material effectively in the presentation of its case.
  • State v. Nunez 174 So. 3d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State of Louisiana v. Mauricio Garcia Cumbrera La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    1 Cir. 5/29/96); writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Cumbrera 149 So. 3d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1 Cir. 5/29/96) ; , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97); .
  • State of Louisiana v. v. L. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    1st Cir.5/29/96), writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Cooper 50 So. 3d 115 La. 2010
  • State v. Morris 22 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    1st Cir.5/29/96), , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97), , reconsideration denied, 96-1734 (La.3/21/97), .
  • State v. Breaux 11 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    App. 1 Cir. 5/29/96), , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.
  • State v. Warren 2 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    1 Cir. 5/29/96) , (defendant was not entitled to change of venue of murder trial based on pretrial publicity, when thorough voir dire of prospective jurors was conducted, most jurors were questioned individually about their exposure to publicity, and all prospective jurors who could not make unbiased judgment based on their exposu
  • State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
    1 Cir. 5/29/96) , (defendant was not entitled to change of venue of murder trial based on pretrial publicity, when thorough voir dire of prospective jurors was conducted, most jurors were questioned individually about their exposure to publicity, and all prospective jurors who could not make unbiased judgment based on their exposu
  • State v. Montz 968 So. 2d 727 La. 2007
    1st Cir.5/29/96), (defendant was not entitled to change of venue of murder trial based on pretrial publicity, when thorough voir dire of prospective jurors was conducted, most jurors were questioned individually about their exposure to publicity, and all prospective jurors who could not make unbiased judgment based on their exposu
  • State v. Juniors 918 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    1 Cir. 5/29/96) , , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Glynn Juniors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    1 Cir. 5/29/96), writ denied, 96-1734 (La.
  • State v. Pitre 901 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    1st Cir.5/29/96), , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97), .
  • State v. Gordon 896 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    1st Cir.5/29/96), , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97), .
  • State v. Rodriguez 822 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    1 Cir. 5/29/96), , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97), .
  • State v. Richard 812 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Jones 767 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    1 Cir. 5/29/96) , , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Hamilton 747 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    1 Cir. 5/29/96) ; , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97); .
  • State v. Burns 734 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    1 Cir. 5/29/96), , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97), .
  • State v. Wright 730 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    1 Cir. 5/29/96), , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.
  • State v. Dozier 713 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    1 Cir. 5/29/96) ; , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97); , reconsideration denied, 96-1734 (La.3/21/97); , the first circuit summarized the applicable law as follows: The suppression of evidence favorable to an accused by the prosecution violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to p
  • State v. Eames 714 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    1st Cir. 5/29/96), , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97), .
  • State v. Schexnayder 708 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    1st Cir. 5/29/96), , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97), .
  • State v. Burmaster 710 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    1 Cir. 5/29/96) ; -170 , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97); .
  • State v. Tipton 705 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1st Cir. 5/29/96); , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97); .
  • State v. Lutcher 700 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1st Cir. 5/29/96), , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.
  • State v. Hebert 697 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1st Cir. 5/29/96), , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.1/6/97), .
  • State v. Thomas 693 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1 Cir. 5/29/96); -170 , writ denied, 96-1734 (La.