Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vincent v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 671 So. 2d 1127.
- Sonia Devi Ellis v. Timothy J. Heinzen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- Joseph Tatney v. City of Deridder La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
- Tatney v. City of Deridder 206 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- John Anthony Guidry v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
- Guidry v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc. 164 So. 3d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
-
Felix Mouton, Jr. v. Rapides Parish Police Jury
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 4/3/96), (citation omitted).
-
Mouton v. Rapides Parish Police Jury
927 So. 2d 1195
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 4/3/96), (citation omitted).
-
James Ronald Johnson v. Hamilton Medical Group
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 4/3/96), this court later departed from Theriot, finding that despite the execution of a satisfaction of judgment, directing cancellation of the judgment, other factors can simultaneously exist to serve as an indication of the appealing party’s intent to maintain the right to appeal.
-
Johnson v. Hamilton Medical Group
900 So. 2d 341
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 4/3/96) , , this court later departed from Theriot, , finding that despite the execution of a satisfaction of judgment, directing cancellation of the judgment, other factors can simultaneously exist to serve as an indication of the appealing party’s intent to maintain the right to appeal.
-
Griffin v. Louisiana Sheriff's Auto Risk
802 So. 2d 691
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
3rd Cir.4/3/96), , judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and against the tortfeasor and his insurer.
-
Explained
Verret v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
759 So. 2d 115
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
App. 3 Cir. 4/3/96); , a potential appellant's right to appeal is forfeited for acquiescence only when the intention to acquiesce and abandon the appeal are clearly demonstrated.
-
Bell v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.
707 So. 2d 102
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
3d Cir. 4/3/96), , and citations therein.
-
Johnson v. Dickens
702 So. 2d 1110
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
3 Cir. 4/3/96) , , wherein this court held that the plaintiff was not precluded from appealing even though she entered into a satisfaction of judgment.
- Orgeron v. SEC. INDUS. FUNERAL HOMES 690 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997