Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Venable v. Dr. X, 671 So. 2d 1249.

19 citing documents.

Medical Review Panel Kevin Jordan (D) v. Community Care Hospital, J. Robert Barnes, M.D. and Anwar Ismail, M.D. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 3 Cir. 4/3/96), and observing that given the “trial court's finding that medical expert testimony would be required for Ms. Reinke to establish her burden of proof at trial, any statements made in her affidavit would not be sufficient to defeat summary judgment”); Mitchell v. Kenner Reg’l Med.
Michelle Dore Reinke v. Dr. Stanley Kordisch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Reinke v. Kordisch 134 So. 3d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Alfred Dupree v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 4/3/96), (quoting Richoux v. Tulane Med.
Dupree v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. 74 So. 3d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 4/3/96), (quoting Richoux v. Tulane Med.
Barbara Deville v. Albert Craig Pearce, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 4/3/96), quoting Richoux v. Tulane Med.
DeVILLE v. Pearce 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 4/3/96), , quoting Richoux v. Tulane Med.
Ray Marie Douet v. Azalea Villa Nursing and Rehabilitation Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 4/3/96), (quoting Richoux v. Tulane Med.
Douet v. Azalea Villa Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC 943 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 4/3/96), (quoting Richoux v. Tulane Med.
Jeffery v. Bickham 795 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Hinson v. Glen Oak Retirement Home 774 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Richardson v. Lagniappe Hosp. Corp. 764 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
3d Cir.4/3/96), ; Dean v. Ochsner Medical Foundation Hospital and Clinic, 99-466 (La.App.
Dean v. OCHSNER MEDICAL FOUNDATION HOSP. 749 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Lee v. Wall 726 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
3d Cir.04/03/96), ; (La.
Robertson v. Northshore Regional Medical Center 723 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
3rd Cir.4/3/96), ; Taplin v. Lupin, 97-1058 (La.App.
Taylor v. Moseley 698 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Jones v. Boustany 692 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
The court agrees with the defendant that Venable v. Dr. X and Dr. Y, 95-1634 (La.App.3 Cir.1996) [ ] ...
Powers v. Tucker 690 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Guillory v. Dr. X 679 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
3 Cir. 4/3/96) ; , this court recently applied the rationale of Richoux to a factual scenario similar to the instant case.