Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rowe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 670 So. 2d 718.

55 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Carlos Washington La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
App. 3 Cir. 3/6/96), writ denied, 96-824 (La.
Oris Latour, Ind. and Virgie Latour, Ind. v. Steamboat's, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3 Cir. 3/6/96); writ denied, 96-842 (La.
Shawn Copell v. Arceneaux Ford, Inc. and Amtrust North America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
3 Cir. 3/6/96), 6 writ denied, 96-824 (La.
Latoya Fontenot v. Uv Insurance Risk Retention La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
3 Cir. 3/6/96), writ denied, 96-824 (La.
Louise Theresa Doty v. Goauto Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 3/6/96), writ denied, 96-824 (La.
Doty v. Goauto Ins. Co. 251 So. 3d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 3/6/96), , 732, writ denied , 96-824 (La.
Tyron Reed v. Dondi Lacombe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/6/96), writ denied, 96-824 (La.
Reed v. LaCombe 172 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/6/96) , , writ denied, 96-824 (La.5/17/96), , allows an award of special damages where the treatment is not related to the accident provided that the treatment was sought in good faith.
Nolan C. Barras, Jr., Et Ux. v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/6/96), writ denied, 96–824 (La.
Barras v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 157 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/6/96), , writ denied, 96-824 (La.5/17/96), ).
Bennie C. Lewis v. B-N-D Garage & Towing, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/6/96), writ denied, 96-824 (La.
Nancy Taylor v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/6/96), writ denied, 96-824 (La.
Taylor v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. 33 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/6/96), , writ denied, 96-824 (La.5/17/96), ).
Betty Augustine, Et Vir. v. Safeco National Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/6/96), writ denied, 96-824 (La.
Augustine v. Safeco National Ins. Co. 18 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/6/96), , writ denied, 96-824 (La.5/17/96), .)
Shannon Menard v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/6/96), writ denied, 96-824 (La.
Menard v. Lafayette Insurance 13 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/6/96) , , writ denied, 96-824 (La.5/17/96), .
Marie Benniefiel v. Zurich American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Benniefiel v. Zurich American Insurance 10 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Rainey v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 6 So. 3d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3rd Cir.3/6/96), , 728 & n. 14, writ denied, 96-0824 (La.5/17/96), .
Tanya White v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/6/96), writ denied, 96-0824 (La.
White v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. 6 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/6/96), , writ denied, 96-0824 (La.5/17/96), , we stated: “As a general rule, the factual basis of an expert’s opinion goes to the credibility of the testimony, not its *863 admissibility, and it is up to the opposing party to examine the factual basis of the opinion in cross-examination.
Rainey v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 993 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
3rd Cir.3/6/96), , 728 & n. 14, writ denied, 96-0824 (La.5/17/96), .
Philip Broussard v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/6/96), -29, writ denied, 96-0824 (La.5/17/96), this court stated: As a general rule, the factual basis of an expert’s opinion goes to the credibility of the testimony, not its admissibility, and it is up to the opposing party to examine the factual basis of the opinion in cr
Broussard v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 984 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/6/96), -29 , writ denied, 96-0824 (La.5/17/96), , this court stated: As a general rule, the factual basis of an expert's opinion goes to the credibility of the testimony, not its admissibility, and it is up to the opposing party to examine the factual basis of the opinion in cross-examination.
Doris Saunier v. Lacye Nolan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/6/96), writ denied, 96-824 (La.
Claudia S. Buller, Et Ux. v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/6/96), (citations omitted), writ denied, 96-824 5 (La.
Mel McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/6/96), -29, writ denied, 96-0824 (La.
McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club 934 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/6/96), -29 , writ denied, 96-0824 (La.5/17/96), , we stated: As a general rule, the factual basis of an expert's opinion goes to the credibility of the testimony, not its admissibility, and it is up to the opposing party to examine the factual basis of the opinion in cross-examination.
Janis Square v. Marjorie Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 3/6/96), writ denied, 96-824 (La.
Square v. LeBlanc 903 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 3/6/96), , writ denied, 96-824 (La.5/17/96), (citing Loudermill v. Dow Chemical Co., 863 F.2d 566 (8th Cir.1988)).
Noran J. Robin, Jr., Et Ux. v. Allstate Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/6/96), writ denied, 96-824 (La.
Robin v. Allstate Indemnity Co. 889 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/6/96), , writ denied, 96-824 (La.5/17/96), , this court, in reviewing matters concerning an expert doctor’s bias, recognized that the “facts disclosed in other proceedings are admissible, [but] trial 13and appellate courts’ opinions as to those facts are not.” We agree with the trial court’s refusal to all
Alexis Davey Taylor v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir.); writ denied, 96-0824 (La.5/17/96)
Taylor v. Allstate Insurance Co. 872 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3 Cir.); , writ denied, 96-0824 (La.5/17/96); .
Thonn v. Cook 863 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 3/6/96); , writ denied, 96-824 (La.5/17/96); .
Fauria v. Dwyer 857 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Lyons v. JA Auger, Inc. 821 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 3/6/96) , , writ denied, 96-0824 (La.5/17/96), .
Francois v. Norfolk Southern Corp. 812 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Carrier v. Nobel Ins. Co. 817 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir.); , writ denied, 96-0824 (La.5/17/96); .
Taylor v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 796 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Co., 95-669, p. 22 (La.App.3 Cir. 3/6/96), , writ denied, 96-0842 (La.5/17/96), , this court stated: A plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he suffered a loss of earning capacity.
Smith v. Clement 797 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
3 Cir. 3/6/96)); , writ denied, 96-824 (La.5/17/96); .
Thibodeaux v. Bernard 772 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 3/6/96) ; , writ denied, 96-824 (La.5/17/96); .
Roberts v. State 776 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 3/6/96); , writ denied, 96-824 (La.5/17/96); .
Barre v. Bonds 763 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 3/6/96) , , wit denied 96-0824 (La.5/17/96), .
Precht v. Case Corp. 756 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 3/6/96); , writ denied, 96-0824 (La.5/17/96); .
Cormier v. THE Ins. Co. 716 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 3/6/96); , writ denied, 96-824 (La.5/17/96); .
Navarro v. Aries Marine Corp. 713 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 3/6/96) ; , writ denied 96-0824 (La.5/17/96); , as its license to discover the above subpoenaed information from Dr. Cobb.
Navarro v. Aries Marine Corp. 713 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 3/6/96) ; , writ denied 96-0824 (La.5/17/96); , as its license to discover the above subpoenaed information from Dr. Cobb.
Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 712 So. 2d 62 La. 1998
3 Cir.3/6/96), , writ denied, 96-0824 (La.5/17/96), ; Matthews v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance, (La.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by