Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Martin v. Champion Ins. Co., 656 So. 2d 991.

38 citing documents.

Brett Lirette v. Jason C. Adams, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Geico Casualty Company & Axis Ventures, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Safeway Insurance Company - Mississippi v. Eulanda Nash La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Gaspard v. Safeway Insurance Co. 202 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), .
Collins v. Downes 83 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 95-0030, p. 3 (La.6/30/95), .
Dukes v. Declouette 40 So. 3d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See Martin v. Champion Insurance Company, 95-0030, p. 13 (La.6/30/95), ; Gaspard v. Allstate Insurance Company, 2004-1502, p. 2 (La.App.
Denton v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. 998 So. 2d 48 La. 2008
He alleged that State Farm failed to notify him of a change in the interest provisions of its policy; therefore, he contended, relying upon this Court's holding in Martin v. Champion Insurance Company, 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), (finding that a supplemental payment provision in an insurance policy which provides that the insurer will pay interest on the entire judgment to the benefit of the insured must be included within the ambit of the UM coverage, unless there is a valid written rejection or sele
D'AMBROSIA v. Lang 985 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), .
Sandra Kay Bergstedt v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
6/30/95), (citing Ainsworth v. Gov’t Employees Ins.
Annie Mae Nunez v. Michael I. Tribe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Nunez v. Tribe 966 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Walker Ex Rel. Walker v. State Farm Mutual 954 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), .
Meaux v. Onel 938 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Co., 95-0030, p. 14 (La.6/30/95), .
LeBlanc v. Aysenne 921 So. 2d 85 La. 2006
Martin v. Champion, 95-0030 p. 8 (La.6/30/95); .
Marie Denise Gaspard v. Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
6/30/95), : This court, in its ruling in Carona, declared that, “[t]he object of the UM statute is to promote full recovery for damages by automobile accident victims....
Gaspard v. Allstate Ins. Co. 903 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), : This court, in its ruling in Carona , declared that, "[t]he object of the UM statute is to promote full recovery for damages by automobile accident victims....
Champagne v. Ward 893 So. 2d 773 La. 2005
Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), .
Edwards v. Daugherty 883 So. 2d 932 La. 2004
Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), ; Hedgepeth v. Guerin, 96-1044 (La.App.
Grace Palm v. Belinda Stewart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Palm v. Stewart 858 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), .
Lebato v. Safeway Insurance Co. 852 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), .
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 848 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Martin v. Champion Insurance Company, 95-0030, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), ; Hedgepeth v. Guerin, 96-1044, p. 16 (La.App.
Ibrahim v. Hawkins 845 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), , in support of this argument.
Dreisel v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CAS. 836 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Martin v. Champion Insurance Company, 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), .
Duncan v. Allstate Insurance 803 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Zuviceh v. Nationwide Ins. Co. 786 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Co., 95-0030, p. 3 (La.6/30/95), .
King v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co. 782 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
[4] Our conclusion regarding the inapplicability of this supplemental payment provision is distinguished from the conclusions reached in Martin v. Champion Insurance Company, 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), (La.App.
Sutton v. Oncale 765 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
In Martin v. Champion Insurance Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), the Supreme Court pretermitted deciding whether the holding of Carona, supra, by extension, makes a UM/UIM insurer liable for the payment of judicial interest on the amount paid to the plaintiff by the tortfeasor's insurer.
Taylor v. Rowell 736 So. 2d 812 La. 1999
Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), ("The purpose of this statute is to promote full recovery for innocent accident victims by making UM coverage available for their benefit."); Cangelosi v. Allstate Ins.
Wood v. Tubre ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 732 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), ; Whiddon v. Hutchinson, 94-2000 (La.App.
Valley v. Specialty Restaurant Corp. 726 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Co., 95-0030, p. 14 (La.6/30/95), ; (La.
Bowens v. Patterson 716 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Co., 95-0030, p. 8 (La.6/30/95); .
Dekeyser v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co. 706 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95)
Ferrell v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 696 So. 2d 569 La. 1997
Co., 95-0030 (La.6/30/95); ; see also Soprano v. State Farm Mut.
Hedgepeth v. Guerin 691 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Martin v. Champion Insurance Company, 95-0030, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), .
Kiefer v. Southern Freightways, Inc. 686 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
However, after the trial court rendered its judgment, the Supreme Court rendered its decision in Martin v. Champion Insurance Co., No. 95-0030 (La.6-30-95); , and that Supreme Court decision makes it clear that State Farm is liable for all of the prejudgment interest despite its $50,000 UM policy limit.
Carter v. Baham 683 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Spiegal v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 680 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Whiddon v. Hutchinson 668 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996