Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Travelers Ins. Co. v. Joseph, 656 So. 2d 1000.

45 citing documents.

Carmen Nicholas v. Terry L. Bonnie La. 2024
James Holmes, Sr. and James Holmes, Jr. v. City of Baker School Board and Ace American Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
6/ 30/ 95), - 03, the Louisiana Supreme Court considered the holding of Johnson in light of an amendment to LSA- R. S. 23: 1101.
Annique Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
6/30/95), for this proposition.
Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Terry Weaver La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
6/30/95), Ryan v. ESIF/Ryan Constr., 46,916 (La.App.
Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Weaver 219 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
6/30/95), ; Ryan v. ESIF/Ryan Constr., 46,916 (La.
Forgey v. Maynor 195 So. 3d 1231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), .
Jessie Cole, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
6/30/95), the second circuit recognized that the supreme court ruled that a UM insurer is a “third 6 person” who is legally liable to pay an employee damages resulting from a work- related accident so that a compensation insurer may seek reimbursement from the UM insurer.
Cole v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 149 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co. v. Joseph, 95-200 (La.6/30/95), , the second circuit recognized that the supreme court ruled that a UM insurer is a “third ^person” who is legally liable to pay an employee damages resulting from a work-related accident so that a compensation insurer may seek reimbursement from the UM insurer.
Advantage Personnel & Louisiana Safety Ass'n of Timbermen v. Cleave 146 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The court relied upon Travelers Insurance Company v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), , wherein the supreme court held that a UM carrier can validly exclude coverage for the benefit of a workers’ compensation insurer, and found that Travelers Insurance Company had not been overruled by more recent supreme court decisions addressing the reduction in liability of a UM insurer resulting from payments to t
Williams v. Peerless Insurance Co. 123 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), ; Kennedy v. Durden, 47,904 (La.App.2d Cir.4/10/13), .
Kennedy v. Durden 116 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), .
Ryan v. Esif/Ryan Construction 88 So. 3d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), .
Agilus Health v. Accor Lodging North America 52 So. 3d 68 La. 2010
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), .
Randy J. Gary v. Moncla Well Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Co. v. Joseph, 95-200 (La.6/30/95)
Gary v. Moncla Well Service 21 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co. v. Joseph, 95-200 (La.6/30/95), .
RACHAL EX REL. REGAN v. State 29 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200, pp. 9-10 (La.6/30/95), .
Cutsinger v. Redfern 12 So. 3d 945 La. 2009
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200, p. 11 (La.6/30/95), (“[N]o statutory provision or policy consideration precludes a UM carrier from contracting to exclude liability for compensation reimbursement.”).
Ella Nicole Salvaggio, Indv., Etc. v. Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Salvaggio v. Allstate Ins. Co. 997 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co. v. Joseph, 95-200 (La.6/30/95), .
Angie Hebert v. Clarendon American Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Hebert v. CLARENDON AMERICAN INS. CO. 984 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co. v. Joseph, 95-200 (La.6/30/95), .
Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co. 980 So. 2d 654 La. 2008
Based on this court's decision in Travelers Insurance Company v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), , which upheld an identical exclusion in a policy of uninsured motorist insurance, the summary judgment was granted and *661 the intervention of Sav-Mor dismissed with prejudice.
Lafayette Profession Firefighters v. Lcpcg 971 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200, p. 10 (La.6/30/95), (alterations in original).
Lafayette Professional Firefighters Assoc. v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/30/95), (alterations in original).
Mamie Kramer v. Raymond E. Oliver La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/30/95), the supreme court analyzed almost identical language.
Kramer v. Oliver 952 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Co. v. Joseph, 95-200 (La.6/30/95), , the supreme court analyzed almost identical language.
Haynes v. United Parcel Service 933 So. 2d 765 La. 2006
In Travelers Insurance Company v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), , this court recognized the scope of the amendment, stating, in pertinent part: The 1989 amendment to LSA-R.S.
Smith v. Burton 928 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
See Travelers Insurance Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200, p. 11 (La.6/30/95), .
Interstate Brands Corp. v. Gallow 927 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Travelers Insurance Company v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), ; Tommie's Novelty v. Velasco, 37,924, p. 6 (La.App.
Viada v. a & a MacHine Works, Inc. 914 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
In Travelers Insurance Company v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court examined an exclusion identical to the one at issue here.
Tolbird v. Wyble 892 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/93), .
Detillier v. Kenner Regional Medical Center 877 So. 2d 100 La. 2004
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), -03 .
Tommie's Novelty v. Velasco 868 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Travelers Insurance Company v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), .
Lockett v. STATE, DOTD 869 So. 2d 87 La. 2004
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), -03 .
Degruise v. Houma Courier Newspaper Corp. 815 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Travelers Insurance Company v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), .
Sunda v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 787 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
23:1101(0 Sunda argues that the Louisiana Supreme Court’s holding in Travelers Insurance Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95); , expanded the definition of a “third person” to include the UM insurer of the employer.
Porter v. Fulton 762 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Co. v. Joseph, 95-C-0200, (La.6/30/95), .
Bergeron v. Williams 764 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
23:1101(A) and (B); Travelers Insurance Company v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), .
State v. Pelas 745 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200, p. 10 (La.6/30/95), .
Meshell v. Lovell 732 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Co. v. Joseph, 95-200 (La.6/30/95), .
Landry v. Martin Mills, Inc. 737 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95); , confronted the question of whether a workers' compensation insurer can recover reimbursement of compensation benefits from an uninsured/underinsured motorist carrier.
LeJeune v. Brewster 722 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
23:1101(A) and (B); Travelers Insurance Company v. Joseph, 95-0200, pp. 7-8 (La.6/30/95); .
Watson v. Funderburk 720 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Co. v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95); , held parties who are solidary obligors by law, may limit their solidarity by contract.
Cleaning Specialists, Inc. v. Johnson 695 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
[1] Based on our appreciation of the holding in Travelers Insurance Company v. Joseph, 95-0200 (La.6/30/95), , we disagree.
Johnson v. Wetherspoon 669 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996