DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Salley v. Salley, 661 So. 2d 437.

14 citing documents.

  • Elizabeth B. Downey v. Kenneth A. Downey La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
    10/ 16/ 95), - 39, citing Krielow v. Krielow, 93- 2539 ( La.
  • Sharon Guillory Christie v. Jeffrey Chad Christie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    Further, Louisiana Civil Code Article 2368 states that “[i]f the separate property of a spouse has increased in value as a result of the uncompensated common labor or industry of the spouses, the other spouse is entitled to be reimbursed from the spouse whose property has increased in value one-half of the increase attributed to the common labor.” In Salley v. Salley, 95-387, p. 3 (La.10/16/95), -39, the supreme court provided: [A] claimant spouse under Article 2368 has the burden of proving: (1
  • Midori Bhati v. Deo Bhati La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    10/16/95), Ramsey v. Ramsey, 96-481 (La.App.
  • Bhati v. Bhati 32 So. 3d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Midori cites three cases in brief relating to Deo’s burden of proof at the trial level, namely Salley v. Salley, 95-387 (La.10/16/95), , Ramsey v. Ramsey, 96-481 (La.App.
  • Kevin J. St. Marie v. Lisa M. Roy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    10/16/95), -39, stated: [A] claimant spouse under Article 2368 has the burden of proving: (1) the property is separate, (2) the property increased in value, and (3) the increase in value was based on the uncompensated or undercompensated labor of the other spouse; the burden then shifts to the other
  • St. Marie v. Roy 29 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Our Louisiana Supreme Court, in Salley v. Salley, 95-387, p. 3 (La.10/16/95), -39 , stated: [A] claimant spouse under Article 2368 has the burden of proving: (1) the property is separate, (2) the property increased in value, and (3) the increase in value was based on the uncompensated or undercompensated labor of the other spouse; the burden then shifts to the other spouse to prove that the
  • New Orleans Opera Ass'n v. Southern Regional Opera Endowment Fund 993 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Salley v. Salley, 95-0387 (La.10/16/95), .
  • Brenda Bordelon v. Gregory D. Bordelon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Bordelon v. Bordelon 942 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Salley v. Salley, 95-0387 (La.10/16/95), .
  • Gill v. Gill 895 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Salley v. Salley, 95-0387 (La.10/16/95), .
  • Brehm v. Brehm 762 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    Salley v. Salley, 95-0387 (La.10/16/95), ; Krielow v. Krielow, 93-2539 (La.4/11/94), .
  • Stewart v. Stewart 728 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Krielow v. Krielow, 93-2539 (La.4/11/94); and Salley v. Salley, 95-0387 (La.10/16/95); are persuasive.
  • Granger v. Granger 722 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 11/23/94) ; , affirmed, 95-0387 (La.10/16/95); .
  • Ramsey v. Ramsey 682 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir. 11/23/94) , , writ granted, 95-0387 (La.4/7/95), , affirmed, 95-0387 (La.10/16/95), .