Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bannister v. Dept. of Streets, 666 So. 2d 641.
-
Civil Service Commission of City of New Orleans v. City of New Orleans
839 So. 2d 196
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Const, art. X, § 10(A)(4); Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 5 (La.1/16/96), ; Paul v. New Orleans Police Dep’t, 96-1441, p. 6, 687 So.2d at 592.
-
Martin v. Sewerage & Water Board
834 So. 2d 672
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
The standard of appellate review of the Commission’s decision is set out in Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404 (La.1/16/96), .
-
Civil Serv. Com'n of No v. City of No
826 So. 2d 23
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
See also, Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404 p. 5 (La.1/16/96), ; Paul v. New Orleans Police Department, 96-1441 p. 6 (La.App.
-
Berry v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR.
835 So. 2d 606
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96), .
- Smith v. New Orleans Police Department 820 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
Evans v. DeRidder Mun. Fire
815 So. 2d 61
La. 2002
Bannister v. Dept. of Streets, 95-C-0404 (La.1/16/96), ( (La.
-
Blappert v. New Orleans Police Department
814 So. 2d 679
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
‘Arbitrary or capricious’ means the absence of rational basis for the action taken.” Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8(La.1/16/96), (citations omitted).
-
Bush v. New Orleans Department of Public Works
806 So. 2d 977
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404 p. 8 (La.1/16/96), .
-
Scott v. New Orleans Department of Finance
804 So. 2d 836
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Art. X, § 1 et seq., Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404 (La.1/16/96), .
-
Wilson v. New Orleans Police Dept.
804 So. 2d 838
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96), .
- Taylor v. New Orleans Police Dept. 804 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
-
Aldor v. New Orleans Fire Department
803 So. 2d 112
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96), .
-
Williams v. New Orleans Police Department
800 So. 2d 1086
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96), .
-
Fihlman v. New Orleans Police Dept.
797 So. 2d 783
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96), .
-
Afscme, Council 17 v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospital
789 So. 2d 1263
La. 2001
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404 (La.1/16/96), .
-
Evans v. DeRidder Mun. Fire & Police Civil Service Bd.
789 So. 2d 752
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
[3] 95-404, p. 8, (La.1/16/96); .
-
Williams v. Department of Police
784 So. 2d 813
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Bannister v. Dept. of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96), .
-
Smith v. New Orleans Police Dept.
784 So. 2d 806
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96), .
-
Jones v. New Orleans Fire Department
785 So. 2d 866
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404 p. 8 (La.1/16/96), ; Staehle v. Department of Police, 98-0216 p. 3 (La.
- McGee v. DOTD 774 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- Walker v. New Orleans Police Department 775 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- Bridges v. Department of Utilities 770 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-
Gorbaty v. Department of State Civil Service
762 So. 2d 1159
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/95), .
-
LaBove v. Raftery
759 So. 2d 240
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Bannister v. Dep't of Streets, 95-404 (La.1/16/96); .
-
Christoffer v. New Orleans Fire Dept.
757 So. 2d 863
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404 (La.2/16/96); .
-
Burckel v. New Orleans Fire Department
757 So. 2d 850
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See also Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404 (La.1/16/96), (CSC’s decision as to penalty should not be reversed by court of appeal unless it is arbitrary, capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion; “arbitrary and capricious” means no rational basis, citing Walters).
-
Jackson v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & HOSPITALS
752 So. 2d 357
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96), .
-
Villanueva v. Commission on Ethics for Public Employees
812 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96); .
-
Perkins v. Rapides Parish Police Jury
738 So. 2d 607
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
LAW AND ARGUMENT In reviewing the Board’s findings of fact, the “reviewing court should apply the clearly wrong or manifest error rule prescribed generally for appellate review.” Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96); .
-
LA DEPT. OF AGRI. & FORESTRY v. Sumrall
728 So. 2d 1254
La. 1999
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 5 (La.1/16/96) , (citing New Orleans Firefighters Ass'n.
-
Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry v. Sumrall
728 So. 2d 1254
La. 1999
“Essentially, civil service laws and rules establish a system under which “non-policy forming” public employees are selected on the basis of merit and can be discharged only for insubordination, incompetency, or improper conduct, andj^not for religious or political reasons.” Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 5 (La.1/16/96) , (citing New Orleans Firefighters Ass’n. v. Civil Service Com’n. of the City of New Orleans, ).
-
Patterson v. New Orleans Fire Department
727 So. 2d 551
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
In Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404 (La.1/16/96); , the Supreme court held that the above language was directory, rather than mandatory.
-
Hills v. New Orleans City Council
725 So. 2d 55
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
‘Arbitrary or capricious’ means the absence of a rational basis for the action taken.” Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96), (citations omitted).
-
Staehle v. Department of Police
723 So. 2d 1031
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96), (citations omitted).
-
MacElli v. New Orleans Police Dept.
720 So. 2d 754
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404 (La.1/16/96), .
-
Sterling v. Department of Public Safety
723 So. 2d 448
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96); .
- Ward v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORR. 718 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
-
Thibodeaux v. City of Opelousas
717 So. 2d 254
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
In Bannister v. Dep’t. of Streets, 95-404 (La.1/16/96), , the court added the following guideline to the requirements of Walters .
-
Murray v. Department of Police
713 So. 2d 838
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404 (La.1/16/96), p. 8, ; Walters, 454 So.2d at 113 .
-
Burke v. Baton Rouge Metro Airport
712 So. 2d 1028
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96); ; Walters, 454 So.2d at 113 ; Khosravanipour, 93-2041, 93-2042, 93-2043, 93-2044, 93-2045 at p. 7; 644 So.2d at 826-827 ; Howard, 457 So.2d at 846 .
-
Southall v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
714 So. 2d 727
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
‘Arbitrary or capricious’ means the absence of a rational basis for the action taken.” Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96), (citations omitted).
- Paul v. New Orleans Police Department 687 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
-
Mariani v. Police Dept.
686 So. 2d 1012
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404 (La.1/16/96), , citing La.
-
Neff v. City Planning Com'n
681 So. 2d 6
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 8 (La.1/16/96), (citations omitted).
-
Montegue v. New Orleans Fire Dept.
675 So. 2d 810
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
1/16/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the decision previously rendered by this court and ruled that the commission's failure to follow its rule requiring appeals to be decided within 90 days did not mandate that its decision be reversed.
- DeLarge v. Department of Finance 672 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996