Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Manuel v. La. Sheriff's Risk Mgmt. Fund, 664 So. 2d 81.

44 citing documents.

Douglas Bienvenu v. 1 and 2 87184 C/W John Doe v. 1 and 2 87515 La. 2024
11/27/95), we recognized the limitation of retroactivity is a basic principle of most legal systems, explaining: The principle that laws are to have a prospective and not retroactive effect is a basic principle of most legal systems.
Beverly Smith v. Citadel Insurance Company as Successor to Gramercy Insurance Company and Goauto Insurance Company La. 2019
Harold Fils v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
11/27/95), where the court addressed whether the source of the duty to avoid bad faith was the insurance contract or the statute.
Fils v. Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. 263 So. 3d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/27/95), , where the court addressed whether the source of the duty to avoid bad faith was the insurance contract or the statute.
Cynthia Anne Cole v. Sabine Bancshares, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Cole v. Sabine Bancshares, Inc. 258 So. 3d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
In re Krebs Lasalle Lemieux Consultants, Inc. 215 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Dana Johno v. John Doe 218 So. 3d 1004 La. 2016
Fund, 95–0406 (La.11/27/95), )] and Sudwischer [v. Estate of Hoffpauir, 97–0785 (La.12/12/97), ] Despite the existence of the exception, the effect of 2006 La.
Krebs, Lasalle, Lemieux Consultants, Inc. v. G.E.C., Inc. 197 So. 3d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-406 (La.11/27/95), -86 ; St.
Danny Kelly v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company 169 So. 3d 328 La. 2015
11/27/95), (noting that La.
Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar 145 So. 3d 271 La. 2014
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371, p. 18 (La.7/1/08), , [n29; Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriffs Risk Management Fund; 95-0406, pp. 8-9 (La.11/27/95), ; Cole, 599 So.2d at 1063 ; St.
Carl R. Guidry, Et Ux. v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
11/27/95), and the Federal Fifth Circuit‟s reasoning in Dickerson v. Lexington Ins.
Guidry v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 74 So. 3d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Following its reasoning in Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff’s Risk Management, 95-406 (La.11/27/95), , and the Federal Fifth Circuit’s reasoning in Dickerson v. Lexington Ins.
State v. Bishop 68 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriffs Risk Management Fund, 95-0406, p. 8 (La.11/27/95), .
Wegener v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 60 So. 3d 1220 La. 2011
In Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff’s Risk Management, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), , we considered whether La.
MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 998 So. 2d 16 La. 2008
Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), ; Segura v. Frank, 93-1271 (La.1/14/94), , 721 n. 16; Rousselle v. Plaquemines Parish Sch.
Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 988 So. 2d 186 La. 2008
Fund, 95-406 (La.11/27/95), , we found that an insurer was liable for statutory penalties under R.S.
Burmaster v. Plaquemines Parish Government 982 So. 2d 795 La. 2008
Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), ).
Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp. 969 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Both parties also cite Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), , as supporting their position on this issue.
Wooley v. AMCARE HEALTH PLANS OF LOUISIANA 944 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Fund, 95-0406, pp. 8-9 (La.11/27/95), -86 .
Sultana Corp. v. Jewelers Mut. Ins. Co. 860 So. 2d 1112 La. 2003
See Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), .
Robin v. Allstate Ins. Co. 844 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-406, p. 6 (La.11/27/95), , 84 when it stated that "[t]he duties that [La.R.S.
Marmino v. City of Crowley 829 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
It explained: "Substantive laws are laws that impose new duties, obligations or responsibilities upon parties, or laws that `establish new rules, rights and duties or change existing ones.'" Manuel [v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund [ at 86 ], [(La.1995)] (citing St.
Evans v. CHARITY HOSP. IN NEW ORLEANS 801 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Fund, 95-0406, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), .
Sylve v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity 803 So. 2d 960 La. 2001
Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406, p. 8 (La.11/27/95), -86 .
Mexic v. Mexic 808 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
2347 , 141 L.Ed.2d 717 (1998); Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff’s Risk Management Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), .
Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp. 785 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
Fund, 95-0406, p. 8 (La.11/27/95), ; Stelly v. Overhead Door Co. of Baton Rouge, 94-0569, pp. 6-7 (La.12/8/94), ; St.
Bourgeois v. AP Green Industries, Inc. 783 So. 2d 1251 La. 2001
11/27/95), ; Segura v. Frank, 93-1271, p. 8 n. 16 (La.1/14/94), , 721 n. 16; Rousselle v. Plaquemines Parish Sch.
Morris v. United Services Auto. Ass'n 756 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), .
Distinguished McCoy v. KMB Transport, Inc. 734 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406, p. 11 (La.11/27/95); .
Brannan v. Talbott 728 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), .
Dillard's Dept. Store v. Cochennic 716 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), .
Revere v. Canulette 715 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Sudwischer v. Estate of Hoffpauir, 705 So.2d at 728 ; see Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), .
Jackson v. Beasley 712 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), .
Sudwischer v. Estate of Huffpauir 705 So. 2d 724 La. 1997
Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), ; St.
McClendon v. Keith Hutchinson Logging 702 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95); .
Hart v. Jack Mims, Inc. 698 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95)
Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co. 694 So. 2d 184 La. 1997
Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95); .
Keith v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. 694 So. 2d 180 La. 1997
Fund, 95-406 (La.11/27/95); ; St.
Guillot v. Blue Cross of Louisiana 690 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Unlike the statute considered in Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff’s Risk Management Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), , La.R.S.
Elswick v. Highway Transport 680 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), .
Succession of Fragala 680 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Fund, 95-0406 (La.11/27/95), .
Smith v. Audubon Ins. Co. 679 So. 2d 372 La. 1996
See Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund, 95-0406, p. 9 (La.11/27/95), .
Thornhill v. STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. 676 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by