DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Andrus v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 670 So. 2d 1206.

93 citing documents.

  • Margaret & Joseph R. Noel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3/22/96), the supreme court stated: In appellate review of general damage awards, the court must accord much discretion to the trial court judge or jury.
  • Noel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 894 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    In Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 95-0801, p. 8 (La.3/22/96), , the supreme court stated: In appellate review of general damage awards, the court must accord much discretion to the trial court judge or jury.
  • Boutte v. Kelly 863 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Robinson v. North American Salt Co. 865 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Co., 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Hornage v. White 841 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Co., 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Vallien v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 812 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Co., 95-0801, pp. 8-9 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Williams v. Taylor 803 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Co., 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), , rehearing denied.
  • Price v. Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans-University Campus 804 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Co., 95-0801, p. 7 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Rebstock v. Hospital Service Dist. No. 1 800 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Co., 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), , the Supreme Court explained the standards governing appellate review of general damage awards stating: Because discretion vested in the trial court is `great,' and even vast, an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co. 809 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Co., 95-0801, p. 8 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Smith v. Roussel 809 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 95-0801, p. 10 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Lacombe v. Buras 778 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • Short v. Plantation Management Corp. 781 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 772 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    Co., 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Taylor v. Sauls 772 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • Thom v. Benson Chevrolet Co. 759 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Co., 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), , the court stated: In appellate review of general damage awards, the court must accord much discretion to the trial court judge or jury.
  • Hymel ex rel. Hymel v. Thomas 758 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Co., 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), , 1210: In appellate review of general damage awards, the court must accord much discretion to the trial court judge or jury.
  • Oubre v. Union Carbide Corp. 747 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Co., 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Bridgers v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Ass'n 746 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 95-0801 (La.3/22/96); .
  • Maddox v. City of Oakdale 746 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Co., 95-0801 (La.3/22/96); .
  • LeBlanc v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. 746 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Co., 95-0801, p. 8 (La.3/22/96); , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the review of general damages as follows: The role of an appellate court in reviewing awards of general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exerci
  • Fontenot v. Omni Ins. Group 745 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Co., 95-0801 (La.3/22/96); .
  • Patrick v. Employers Mut. Cas. Co. 745 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Further, the supreme court stated in Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 95-0801, pp. 8-9 (La.3/22/96); , 1210: "The threshold determination by either the court of appeal or this court is whether the amounts awarded by the trial court constituted an abuse of discretion, in either direction.
  • Taylor v. Premier Insurance 742 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Blades v. Olivier 740 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Andrus v. State Farm, Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 95-0801, p. 8 (La.3/22/96); .
  • Meshell v. Lovell 732 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Cone v. National Emergency Services, Inc. 737 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Further, the supreme court clarified this standard in Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 95-0801, pp. 8-9 (La.3/22/96); , 1210: “The threshold determination by either the court of appeal or this court is whether the amounts awarded by the trial court constituted an abuse of discretion, in either direction.
  • Jacques v. Moses 737 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Further, the supreme court clarified this standard in Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 95-0801, pp. 8-9 (La.3/22/96); , by stating: "[t]he threshold determination by either the court of appeal or this court is whether the amounts awarded by the trial court constituted an abuse of discretion, in either direction.
  • Fox v. Texaco, Inc. 722 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 95-0801, p. 8 (La.3/22/96); ; See also Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Reeves v. Structural Preservation Systems 716 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Sims v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. 714 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Co., 95-0801 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Navarro v. Aries Marine Corp. 713 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 12/28/94) ; , writ granted, 95-801 (La.5/12/95); , reversed in part, 95-801 (La.3/22/96); ; Guillory v. City of Crowley, 93-1060 (La.App.
  • Navarro v. Aries Marine Corp. 713 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 12/28/94) ; , writ granted, 95-801 (La.5/12/95); , reversed in part, 95-801 (La.3/22/96); ; Guillory v. City of Crowley, 93-1060 (La.App.
  • Landry v. Clement 711 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Insurance Company, 95-C-0801 (La.3/22/96); .
  • Ledet v. National Car Rental System, Inc. 694 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Co., 95-801 (La.3/22/96), .
  • Guillory v. Ins. Co. of North America 692 So. 2d 1029 La. 1997
    [3] See Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 95-0801 (La.3/22/96); .
  • Mathews v. Dousay 689 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    In Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 95-0801, p. 8 (La.3/22/96); , the supreme court stated: *512 In appellate review of general damage awards, the court must accord much discretion to the trial court judge or jury.
  • Williams v. State, ex rel. Department of Wildlife & Fisheries 684 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Hebert v. Podiatry Ins. Co. of America 688 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Co., 95-801, p. 8 (La.3/22/96); .
  • Matthews v. Rhodes United Fidelity Funeral Home 680 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Wood v. Toys" R" US, Inc. 681 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    See Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 95-0801 (La.03/22/96), ; Evans v. Haynie, 26,135 (La.
  • Leatherman v. Riverside Village 676 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 95-0801, (La.3/22/96)
  • Denton v. Critikon, Inc. 674 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996