Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Clement v. Frey, 666 So. 2d 607.

412 citing documents.

Stephen Michael Duke" Allgood, Et Ux. v. Roch Bordelon " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Allgood v. Bordelon 185 So. 3d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
When a court of appeal finds that a jury committed manifest error in the allocation of fault, it may adjust the allocation “only -to the extent of lowering or raising it to the highest or lowest point respectively which is reasonably within the trial court’s discretion.” Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, pp. 7-8 (La.1/16/96), .
Patricia Ann Thompson v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. 181 So. 3d 656 La. 2015
Jewitt v. Alvarez 179 So. 3d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), ; Holland, supra.
Kenner Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Rusich Detailing, Inc. 175 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
App. 5 Cir. 5/17/00), , writ denied, 00-1781 (La.9/22/00), (citing Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1168 (La.1/16/96), -10 ).
Harper v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals 176 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“Rather, it is an acceptable range and any allocation by the jury within that range cannot be ‘clearly wrong.’ ” Id., quoting Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, p. 7 (La.1/16/96), pp. 7-8, -11 .
Watson v. Hicks 172 So. 3d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
settled that appellate courts are required to give great deference to the trial court’s allocation of fault and that “[o]nly after making a determination that the trier of fact’s apportionment of fault is clearly wrong can an appellate court disturb the award.” Fontenot v. Patterson Ins., 09-0669, p. 22 (La.10/20/09), (citing Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, p. 7 (La.1/16/96), -11 ).
Bourg v. Cajun Cutters, Inc. 174 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 1163 (La.1/16/96), -11 ; *68 Granger, 145 So.3d at 1087 .
Guerrero v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 165 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Supreme Court has held that when an appellate court finds that a lower court was clearly wrong in apportioning fault, “it should adjust the award, but only to the extent of lowering or raising it to the highest or lowest point respectively which is reasonably within the trial court’s discretion.” Toston v. Pardon, 03-1747 (La.4/28/04), , citing Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
Taylor Adam Burtner v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Sheneatha Stevens v. Market Basket Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Burtner v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government 176 So. 3d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), 610 .
Stevens v. Market Basket Stores, Inc. 176 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
Beggs v. Harrah's New Orleans Casino 158 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Tamayo v. American National General Insurance Co. 150 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
App. 5 Cir. 5/17/00), , writ denied, 00-1781 (La.9/22/00), , citing Clement v. \nFrey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96), -10 .
Dakmak v. Baton Rouge City Police Department 153 So. 3d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, p. 7 (La.1/16/96), .
Granger v. United Home Health Care 145 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 1168 (La.1/16/96), ; Hypolite v. Columbia Dauterive Hosp., 07-357 (La.App.
Harbin v. Ward 147 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), -11 .
Aymami v. St. Tammany Parish Hospital Service District No. 1 145 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
Willis v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation 140 So. 3d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 5/17/00) , , writ denied, 00-1781 (La.9/22/00), , citing Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96), -10 .
Rodriguez v. Walters 136 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
When there is a finding that the trial court made a “clearly wrong” allocation of fault, this Court “should adjust the award, but only to the extent of lowering or raising it to the highest or lowest point respectively which is reasonably within the trial court’s discretion.” Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, pp. 7-8 (La.1/16/96), -11 .
Mary Phyllis Soileau v. Smith True Value and Rental La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Soileau v. Smith True Value & Rental 130 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Oleszkowicz v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 129 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96); .
Johnson v. Johnson 128 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, p. 7 (La.1/16/96), .
Ananias Johnson v. Robert Johnson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95- 1163, p. 7 (La.1/16/96)
Danielle Brooke Thibodeaux v. Ace American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96); 610.
Thibodeaux v. Ace American Insurance Co. 127 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96); 610 .
Travis v. Spitale's Bar, Inc. 122 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Clement v. Frey, 951119, 951163, p. 7 (La.1/16/96), .
Upchurch v. State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 123 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.01/16/96), .
Loconte Partners, LLC v. Montgomery & Associates, Inc. 116 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), -610 .
Normand v. Jones 115 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), -611 ; Stobart, 617 So.2d at 883 .
Byrnside v. Hutto 110 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
Serou v. Touro Infirmary 105 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, p. 7 (La.1/16/96), .
Nina Skinner v. State of Louisiana, Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), 610.
Gaunt v. Progressive Security Insurance 92 So. 3d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-972 ; Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, pp. 6-8 (La.1/16/96), -611 .
Glen Vitrano, Et Ux. v. Nellie Franks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Vitrano v. Franks 92 So. 3d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
Kelli M. Duhon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile ins.co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Duhon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 94 So. 3d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96), .
Franatovich v. St. Bernard Parish Government 88 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, p. 7 (La.1/16/96), .
Barrios v. Safeway Insurance Co. 97 So. 3d 1019 La. 2012
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, p. 5 (La.1/16/96), .
Kathy A. Darbonne, Et Ux. v. Bertrand Investments, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95- 1163, p. 7 (La.1/16/96)
Christina Hoyt Hutto v. McNeil-ppc, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Hutto v. McNeil-PPC, Inc. 79 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 1163 (La.1/16/96), .
Elfers v. AIG National Insurance 80 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, p. 7 (La.1/16/96), (holding that the finding of percentages of fault pursuant to the comparative fault article is a factual determination).
Burdine v. Robertson 69 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
Calvin Dale Miller v. Village of Hornbeck La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), 610.
Miller v. Village of Hornbeck 65 So. 3d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), 610 .
Johnson v. Morehouse General Hospital 63 So. 3d 87 La. 2011
Pursuant to Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96), , after an appellate court finds a “clearly wrong” apportionment of fault, it should adjust the award, but only to the highest or lowest point respectively which is reasonably within the trier of fact’s discretion.