DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Clement v. Frey, 666 So. 2d 607.

412 citing documents.

  • Brown v. Glaxo, Inc. 790 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, p. 8 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Roberts v. State 776 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 773 So. 2d 670 La. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96); 610 .
  • Cornelius v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 772 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Nunez v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 774 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Dupree v. City of New Orleans 765 So. 2d 1002 La. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 c/w 95-1163 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Ruttley v. Lee 761 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.01/16/96), -610 .
  • Hartford v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 765 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • Jones v. Allstate Insurance Co. 759 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Irion v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 760 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, pp. 7-8 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Magee v. Pittman 761 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, pp. 5-7 (La.1/16/96), -10 .
  • Ford v. STATE, EX REL. DOTD 760 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, pp. 7-8 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Saden v. Kirby 759 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Wood v. Subsea International, Inc. 766 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, p. 8 (La.1/16/96); .
  • James v. Jones 759 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), ; Hughes v. Bossier Parish School Bd., 32,225 (La.App.
  • Strouse v. M & M PROPERTIES 753 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.01/16/96), ; Henderson v. Sutherland's Lumber Co., 31,714 (La.App.2d Cir.03/31/99), ; Stephens v. Town of Jonesboro, 25,715, 25,716 (La.App.2d Cir.08/19/94), , writs denied, 94-2351, 94-2557 (La.11/19/94), .
  • Arbon v. Charbonnet 761 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Feurtado v. Zapata Gulf Marine Corp. 751 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, p. 8 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Lee v. State 751 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, pp. 5-8 (La.1/16/96), -611 .
  • Cole v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 755 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Cole v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 755 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • Whitehead v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 758 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Slavich v. Knox 750 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    In reviewing the jury's allocation of fault among the parties, we are guided by Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96), -611 .
  • Wainwright v. Fontenot 750 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Guillot v. Valley Forge Ins. Co. 753 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    In reviewing allocation of fault, the Louisiana Supreme Court in Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96); -11 , explained, "there is an analogy between excessive or inadequate quantum determinations and excessive or inadequate fault percentage determinations.
  • Maddox v. City of Oakdale 746 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Shelvin v. Allstate Insurance Co. 747 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • Kerrigan v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 748 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Kerrigan v. IMPERIAL FIRE AND CAS. INS. 748 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Hughes v. Bossier Parish School Bd. 745 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), ; Towns v. Georgia Cas.
  • Barnes v. Reed 743 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Madison v. Thurman 743 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), ; Donavan v. Jones, 26,883 (La.App.2d Cir.6/21/95), , writs denied, 95-1786, 95-1891 (La.11/3/95), .
  • Schlette v. Washington 752 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Courteaux v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. 745 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96), pp. 7-8, -611 .
  • Gladney v. Sneed 742 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    4th Cir.), writ denied (1991); Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Patrick v. Employers Mut. Cas. Co. 745 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Ludwig v. Jefferson Performing Arts Society 737 So. 2d 1267 La. 1999
    In Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), , we held that when a trial court’s allocation of fault is manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong, the reviewing court must lower (or raise) the allocation of fault to the highest (or lowest) point which is reasonably within the trial court’s discretion.
  • Gryder v. Jackson 739 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.01/16/96), .
  • Johnson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 740 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96), pp. 7-8, -611 .
  • Zagar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 747 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    1/16/96); , which requires deference to the trial court’s allocation of fault, we must affirm.
  • Lederer v. Famous Entertainment, Inc. 732 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity 738 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    01/16/96), ; Ramirez, supra .
  • Doyle v. McKinney 732 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    ALLOCATION OF FAULT In our review of the trial court's allocation of fault between the defendant's, we are guided by Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96), -611 .
  • Crews v. Babin 732 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    With regards to appellate review of a fact-finder's apportionment of fault, in Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the standard of review is essentially identical to that used to review damage awards, reiterating that "[o]nly after making the finding that the record supports that the lower court abused its much discretion can the appellate court disturb the award, and then only to the e
  • Sims v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. 731 So. 2d 197 La. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Howard v. Derokey 729 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96), pp. 7-8, -611 .
  • Valley v. Specialty Restaurant Corp. 726 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163 (La.1/16/96), -11 .
  • Olivier v. Alexander 737 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • Cazes v. Parish of West Baton Rouge 744 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119, 95-1163, p. 8 (La.1/16/96); , quoting Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
  • LeBlanc v. Steptore 723 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96); guided by the Watson [v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Co., (La.