DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Matthews v. Farley Industries, 668 So. 2d 1144.

22 citing documents.

  • Corey Lamartiniere v. Boise Cascade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • Lamartiniere v. Cascade 193 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See, e.g., Matthews v. Farley Indus., 95-1387, 95-1796 (La.2/28/96), .
  • Frye v. Mills 47 So. 3d 1155 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387 (La.2/28/96), ; Johnson v. Fresenius Medical Care, 43, 952 (La.App.2d Cir.2/4/09), .
  • Fox v. Reynolds Industrial Contractors 33 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Johnson v. Fresenius Medical Care, supra, citing Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387 (La.2/28/96), .
  • Brock Dore v. S & S Coating Specialties La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Dore v. S & S COATING SPECIALTIES, INC. 23 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Matthews v. Farley Indus., 95-1387 (La.2/28/96), .
  • Johnson v. Fresenius Medical Care 4 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387 (La.2/28/96), .
  • Peters v. General Motors Corp. 892 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Matthews v. Farley Industries c/w Martin v. Texaco, Inc., 95-1387, 95-1796 (La.02/28/96), .
  • Williams v. BET Construction, Inc. 857 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    and Martin v. Texaco, Inc., 95-1387, 95-1796 (La.2/28/96), , both claimants were voluntarily paid compensation benefits, and their benefits were terminated by their employers, resulting in subsequent suits for compensation.
  • Williams v. BET Const., Inc. 818 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387 (La.2/28/96), , our Supreme Court was faced with the issue of whether a workers' compensation claimant can seek modification of an adverse judgment denying benefits.
  • Stadtlander v. Ryan's Family Steakhouses, Inc. 794 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    nom., Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387 (La.2/28/96); (exception of no cause of action treated as exception of lack of subject matter jurisdiction); Anzalone v. Allstate Ins.
  • Critser v. Dillard's Dept. Stores, Inc. 791 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    1st Cir.5/5/95), , writ granted and affirmed in Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387, 95-1796 (La.2/28/96), .
  • LeBas v. Union Tank Co. 754 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    However, in the consolidated cases of Matthews v. Farley Industries, Inc. and Martin v. Texaco, Inc., 95-1387, 95-1796 (La.2/28/96); , cited by Union Tank, both claimants were voluntarily paid compensation benefits, their benefits were terminated by their employers, resulting in subsequent suits for compensation.
  • Jackson v. Iberia Parish Government 732 So. 2d 517 La. 1999
    The court of appeal determined that our previous decision in Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387, 95-1796 (La.2/28/96), , was controlling.
  • Batiste v. Crowley Mills/Farley 735 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387, p. 6 (La.2/28/96), , decided two years after Jones, the supreme court held that the present version of La.R.S.
  • Chaisson v. Oceanside Seafood 713 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    As in Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387 (La.2/28/96), , the claimant contends in this proceeding that he has now become disabled from the original injury, and the issue is whether the earlier judgment precludes Mr. Chaisson's claim for his present disability.
  • Anzalone v. Allstate Insurance Co. 714 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Allstate filed a peremptory exception raising the objection of no cause of action, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387 (La.2/28/96); .
  • Boutte v. Langston Companies, Inc. 707 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    In Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387, p. 6 (La.2/28/96), , decided two years after Jones, the supreme court held that the present version of La.R.S.
  • Brown v. Rouse Co. 706 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387, 95-1796 (La.2/28/96), .
  • McKee v. Home Depot 695 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    23:1310.8 because the first Judgment specifically awarded no indemnity benefits and, therefore, the Judgment cannot be modified to award SEBs, citing Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387 (La.2/28/96), .
  • Jackson v. Iberia Parish Government 693 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    See Matthews v. Farley Industries, 95-1387, 95-1796 (La.2/28/96), .
  • Ancelet v. Russell Stutes Construction 693 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    In Matthews v. Farley Indus., 95-1387, 95-1796 (La.2/28/96); , La.R.S.