Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite DEPT. OFFICE OF STATE & CORR., OFFICE OF STATE POLICE v. Mensman, 671 So. 2d 319.

18 citing documents.

Tracy Pree v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Edmonds v. Dep't of Pub. Works 260 So. 3d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, Office of State Police v. Mensman, 95-1950, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), , 321.
Rivet v. Dep't of Police 258 So. 3d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Cunningham v. New Orleans Police Dep't 257 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Todd Huval and Chad Boyer v. State of Louisiana Through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Office … 222 So. 3d 665 La. 2017
In re Appeal of Dyson 196 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Office of State Police v. Mensman, 95-1950 (La.4/8/96), (per curiam).
Brown v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Office of State Police 181 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Office of State Police v. Mensman, 95-1950 (La.4/8/96), (per curiam); Huval v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections, 09-0699 (La.
City of Bossier City v. Vernon 100 So. 3d 301 La. 2012
In Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Office of State Police v. Mensman, 1995-1950, p. 3-4 (La.4/8/96); , we relied on our holding in Walters, supra, to find the State Police Commission’s authority “to hear and decide” disciplinary cases in-eluded a duty to decide independently from the facts not only whether the appointing authority has good or lawful cause for taking disciplinary action, but also whether the puni
Huval v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 29 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Office of State Police v. Mensman, 95-1950, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), ; Berry v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections, 2001-2186, p. 7 (La.App.
Landry v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections 966 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
4/8/96), : An employee who has gained permanent status in the classified state police service cannot be subjected to disciplinary action by his employer except for cause expressed in writing.
Lt. Rickey Jones v. City of Natchitoches Police Dept. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
4/8/96), Jones v. Dep’t. of Pub.
Jones v. City of Natchitoches Police Dept. 957 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Office of the State Police v. Mensman, 95-1950 (La.4/8/96), , Jones v. Dep’t. of Pub.
Bailey v. Dept. of Public Safety 951 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
LAW AND DISCUSSION In Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Office of State Police v. Mensman, *240 95-1950, p. 3-4 (La.4/8/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court, adopting a recitation of applicable legal principles previously set forth by this Court stated: An employee who has gained permanent status in the classified state police service cannot be subjected to disciplinary action by his employer except for cause expressed in writing.
Berry v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 835 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Office of State Police v. Mensman, 95-1950, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), .
Afscme, Council 17 v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospital 789 So. 2d 1263 La. 2001
See Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Office of State Police v. Mensman, 95-1950 (La.4/8/96), .
Lott v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 747 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
95-1950, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), .
Caesar v. New Orleans Police Department 746 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
8(A); Department of Public Safety and Corrections, et al. v. Mensman, 95-1950 (La.4/8/96) (citing Walters v. Department of Police, 454 So.2d.
Antoine v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 681 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
DISCUSSION In Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Office of State Police v. Mensman, 95-1950, p. 3-4 (La.4/8/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court, adopting a recitation of applicable legal principles previously set forth by this court, stated: An employee who has gained permanent status in the classified state police service cannot be subjected to disciplinary action by his employer except for cause expressed in writing.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by