Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Baumeister v. Plunkett, 673 So. 2d 994.
-
Brumfield v. Coastal Cargo Co., Inc.
768 So. 2d 634
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270, p. 3 (La.5/21/96), .
-
Timmons v. Silman
761 So. 2d 507
La. 2000
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96), .
-
Baggett v. Brumfield
758 So. 2d 332
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
[10] La.Civ.Code art. 2320; Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96); .
-
Distinguished
Ryback v. Belle
753 So. 2d 383
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270, p. 5 (La.5/21/96), .
-
Affeltranger-Cheramie v. Zachary
757 So. 2d 751
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270, pp. 3-4 (La.5/21/96); -97 .
-
Brasseaux v. Town of Mamou
752 So. 2d 815
La. 2000
Russell v. Noullet, 98-0816 (La.12/1/98), ; Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96), .
-
Felix v. Briggs of Oakwood, Inc.
750 So. 2d 1091
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96), .
-
Rambo v. Webster Parish School Bd.
745 So. 2d 770
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Russell v. Noullet, 98-0816 (La.12/01/98), ; Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.05/21/96)
-
Doe v. Louisiana Mun. Ass'n
746 So. 2d 179
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
In Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96) , the court held an employer was not vicariously liable for a sexual attack by one employee on another that occurred during working hours.
-
Giammanchere v. Ernst
742 So. 2d 572
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270, p. 7 (La.5/21/96), ; Bailey at 4-5, 695 So.2d at 559 .
-
Tanner v. Reynolds Metals Co.
739 So. 2d 893
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270, p. 10 (La.5/21/96), .
-
Watkins v. International Service Systems
741 So. 2d 171
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
art. 2320; Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.05/21/96), ; Barto, supra .
-
Hubbard v. Lakeland Nursing Home
734 So. 2d 1280
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270, p. 3 (La.5/21/96); , citing Scott v. Commercial Union Ins.
-
Wright v. Skate Country, Inc.
734 So. 2d 874
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270, p. 3 (La.5/21/96), ; Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353, p. 4 (La.7/5/94), .
-
Brasseaux v. Town of Mamou
736 So. 2d 288
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96); , citing Benoit v. Capitol Mfg.
-
Delphin v. Montealegre
732 So. 2d 757
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270, p. 3 (La.5/21/96); , -18 (La.1974).
-
Taylor v. Shoney's, Inc.
726 So. 2d 519
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
In Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96), , our Supreme Court considered whether a hospital was vicariously liable for the sexual battery committed by one of its supervisors upon a co-employee during working hours on the hospital's premises.
-
Dunmiles v. ST. CHARLES PARISH REC. DEPT.
726 So. 2d 485
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96), .
-
Hillman v. Edwards Transmission
722 So. 2d 338
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.05/21/96), .
-
Russell v. Noullet
721 So. 2d 868
La. 1998
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96); , citing Benoit v. Capitol Mfg.
-
Hanson v. Benelli
719 So. 2d 627
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Baunieister v. Plunkett, 95-2270, p. 3 (La.5/21/96), (citation omitted).
-
Doe v. Parauka
714 So. 2d 701
La. 1998
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96), .
-
Brasseaux v. Town of Mamou
713 So. 2d 742
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96); .
-
Harrington v. La. State Bd. of Elementary and Secondary Educ.
714 So. 2d 845
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96)
-
Allen v. Payne & Keller Co., Inc.
710 So. 2d 1138
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
[15] Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270, p. 4 (La.5/21/96), .
-
Miramon v. Bradley
701 So. 2d 475
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
5/21/96); ; Koury v. Lanier Express, Inc., -740 (La.
-
Pye v. Insulation Technologies, Inc.
700 So. 2d 892
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
The trial court properly relied on Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96), , in analyzing whether the actions of *894 the worker gave rise to vicarious liability of defendant.
-
Hawthorn v. City of Bossier City
697 So. 2d 680
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
See Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96) ; Reed v. House of Decor, Inc.
-
Bailey v. STATE, THROUGH DHHR
695 So. 2d 557
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270, p. 7 (La.5/21/96), .
-
Varnado v. Department of Employment and Training
687 So. 2d 1013
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
5/21/96); ; Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 p. 4 (La.
- Patterson v. Al Copeland Enterprises, Inc. 683 So. 2d 1196 La. 1996
-
Jaeger v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co.
682 So. 2d 292
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
See, e.g., Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270, p. 7 (La.5/21/96), .
-
Lawson v. Straus
684 So. 2d 959
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Cf. Baumeister v. Plunkett, No. 95-2270 (La.5/21/96), (fourfactor analysis of employer's vicarious liability for intentional torts of employee).