DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 676 So. 2d 89.

78 citing documents.

  • Ates v. Mallard Bay Drilling, Inc. 801 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446 (La.7/2/96), ; Derouen v. Mallard Bay Drilling, LLC, 00-1268 (La.App.
  • Terre Aux Borufs Land v. JR Gray Barge 803 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    The Louisiana Supreme Court provided further guidance for deciding whether federal or state law controls in Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., (1996), as follows: [T]he key consideration in determining whether state laws apply in maritime cases is uniformity.
  • Derouen v. MALLARD BAY DRILLING, LLC. 808 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446, p. 11 (La.7/2/96), .
  • Wright v. Hollywood Marine, Inc. 789 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., et al., 95-2446 (La.7/2/96), .
  • Dean v. Ramos Corp. 781 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446 (La.7/2/96), .
  • Melerine v. State 773 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, 95-2446 (La.7/2/96), the court held that prejudgment interest on future losses is not appropriate under federal law unless "an action is based strictly on the Jones Act," so long as the case is tried to the court and the court exercises its admiralty jurisdiction.
  • Harper v. Falrig Offshore, Inc. 776 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    [2] See Milstead v. Diamond M. Offshore, Inc. 95-2446 (La.7/2/96); .
  • Richard v. Mike Hooks, Inc. 772 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446 (La.7/2/96); ; Day v. Touchard, Inc., 97-1180 (La.App.
  • Nielsen v. Northbank Towing, Inc. 768 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446, p. 14 (La.7/2/96), .
  • Parker v. Southwestern Offshore Corp. 763 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    927 (1922); Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446 (La.7/2/96), ; Green, supra.
  • Williams v. Maritime Overseas Corp. 746 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    IsThe Supreme Court with Justice Victory as the organ in Milstead v. Diamond M. Offshore, Inc. at page 91 stated: “We granted certiorari in this maritime personal injury case to resolve a conflict among the circuits regarding the standard of appellate review to be applied when reviewing admiralty cases decided in state courts under the “Saving to Suitors” Clause and under the Jones Act, and to address
  • Crane v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. 743 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc. 95-2446, (La.7/2/96), .
  • Breeland v. Falcon Drilling Co., Inc. 733 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    App. 3 Cir. 9/6/95); (citations omitted), affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded, 95-2446 (La.7/2/96); .
  • Vendetto v. Sonat Offshore Drilling Co. 725 So. 2d 474 La. 1999
    1973); Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446 (La.7/2/96); (holding that standard of appellate review in admiralty cases decided in state court is not federal standard but rather Louisiana's manifest error standard).
  • Dragon v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring 726 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446 (La.7/2/96), .
  • Fox v. Texaco, Inc. 722 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    3rd Cir.9/6/95); , rev'd on other grounds, 95-2446 (La.7/2/96); .
  • Navarro v. Aries Marine Corp. 713 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    See Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446 (La.7/2/1996); .
  • Navarro v. Aries Marine Corp. 713 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    See Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446 (La.7/2/1996); .
  • Walton v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring 709 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Yet, the Louisiana Supreme Court, in Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446 (La.7/2/96), , held that a Jones Act claim, tried to a judge, permitted pre-judgment interest at the discretion of the court.
  • Parks v. Pine Bluff Sand & Gravel Co. 712 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    See Milstead v. Diamond M. Offshore, Inc., 95-2446 (La.7/2/96); .
  • Jenkins v. Sonat Offshore USA Inc. 705 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    In Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446, p. 11 (La.7/2/96); , the Louisiana Supreme Court directed state appellate courts to apply Louisiana's manifest error standard of review to factual determinations made in Jones Act and general maritime cases.
  • Viator v. Liverpool & London SS Protection and Indem. Ass'n 701 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446, p. 11 (La.7/2/96); ."
  • Maddox v. Omni Drilling Corp. 698 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446 (La.7/2/96); .
  • Barry v. Plaquemine Towing Corp. 698 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Cappiello v. Exxon Corp. 695 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446 (La.7/2/96); .
  • Howell v. American Cas. Co. of Reading 691 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    The issue is governed by the recent decision Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446 (La.7/2/96), .
  • Hollenbeck v. Oceaneering Intern., Inc. 685 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc., 95-2446, p. 11 (La.7/2/96); .
  • Van Atta v. Team Services, Inc. 684 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    7/2/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court directed state appellate courts to apply Louisiana's manifest error standard of review in general maritime and Jones Act cases.