DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 671 So. 2d 899.

42 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. in the Interest of K.S. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
    See State v. Schoening, 00–0903, p. 4 (La.10/17/00), citing Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95–0713, p. 6 (La.1/26/96), (recognizing that “Louisiana jurisprudence requires that the constitutionality of a statute be specially pleaded in a petition, exception, written motion, or answer and that the grounds be particularized, so that the parties are given
  • Bloom v. State 256 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    1/26/96), , 901-02 ; See e.g. , Carver v. Louisiana Dep't of Pub.
  • State ex rel. Arnaud v. State 188 So. 3d 1004 La. 2016
    1/26/96), (recogrrizing that “Louisiana jurisprudence requires that the constitutionality of a statute be specialty pleaded in a petition, exception, written motion, or answer and Aat the grounds be particularized, so that the parties are given sufficient time to brief and prepare arguments regarding their position on a co
  • State v. Wise 182 So. 3d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), ; State v. Mickel, 07-47, p. 15 (La.App.
  • In Re: Angela Marie Costanza and Chasity Shanelle Brewer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94- 1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65.
  • State v. Jones 131 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 12/29/09) , , writ denied, 10-0271 (La.9/17/10), , citing Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713 (La.1/26/96), .
  • State ex rel. C.M. 128 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See Schoening, supra, 00-0903 at 4, 770 So.2d at 765 ; Williams v. State, Dept, of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 6 (La.1/26/96), ; State v. Campbell, 263 La.
  • State v. Overstreet 111 So. 3d 308 La. 2013
    See State v. Schoening, 00-0903, p. 4 (La.10/17/00), , citing Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 6 (La.1/26/96), (recognizing that “Louisiana jurisprudence requires that the constitutionality of a statute be specially pleaded in a petition, exception, written motion, or answer and that the grounds be particularized, so that the parties are given sufficient time to brief and prepare arguments regarding their position on a co
  • Johnson v. Motiva Enterprises, LLC 95 So. 3d 1086 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    An appellate court may not consider a constitutional challenge unless it was “properly raised and pleaded in the trial court below.” Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), ; State v. Hatton, 2007-2377, p. 13 (La.7/1/08), .
  • State v. Whitmore 58 So. 3d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    See State v. Hatton, 07-2377 (La.07/01/08), ; State v. Schoening, 00-0903 (La.10/17/00), ; Williams v. State Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713 (La.01/26/96), .
  • State v. Oliver 30 So. 3d 946 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Williams v. State, Dept, of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), ; State v. Miekel, 07-47, p. 15 (La.App.
  • Miller v. Crescent City Health Care Center 24 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 10/1/96), ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 5 (La.1/26/96), ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), ; M.J.
  • Miller v. Crescent City Health Care Center 24 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 10/1/96), ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 5 (La.1/26/96), ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), ; M.J.
  • State v. Williams 5 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713 (La.1/26/96), -902 ; State v. Mickel, 07-47, p. 15 (La.App.
  • Phillips v. LAFAYETTE CITY-PARISH CONSOL. GOVERNMENT 995 So. 2d 1190 La. 2008
    State v. Hatton, 2007-2377, *1197 p. 10 (La.7/1/08), ; State v. Citizen, XXXX-XXXX, p. 11 (La.4/1/05), Williams v. State, Department of Health and Hospitals, XXXX-XXXX, p. 2-3 (La.1/26/96), -902 .
  • State v. Hatton 985 So. 2d 709 La. 2008
    See State v. Schoening, 00-0903, p. 4 (La.10/17/00), , citing Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 6 (La.1/26/96), (recognizing that "Louisiana jurisprudence requires that the constitutionality of a statute be specially pleaded in a petition, exception, written motion, or answer and that the grounds be particularized, so that the parties are given sufficient time to brief and prepare arguments regarding their position on a co
  • State v. Borden 986 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Clinton B. Schneider, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65.
  • State v. Schneider 981 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 .
  • 3525 NORTH CAUSEWAY BLVD. CORP. v. Penney 982 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713 (La.1/26/96), ; Koeppen v. Raz, 29,880 (La.App.
  • Deculus v. Welborn 964 So. 2d 930 La. 2007
    Istre v. Meche, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239, (La.10/21/97), ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, (La.1/26/96), ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • State v. Mickel 961 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713 (La.1/26/96), .
  • Ceasar v. Hebert 926 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 .
  • Irving Ceasar v. Sheriff Sid Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65.
  • State ex rel. D.H. 906 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Williams v. State, Department of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713 (La.1/26/96), .
  • Unwired Telecom v. Parish of Calcasieu 903 So. 2d 392 La. 2005
    Relying upon Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0173 (La.1/26/96), , and Vallo, 646 So.2d at 865 , we recognized a brief is not a pleading and cannot be used as a vehicle to contest the constitutionality of a statute.
  • Lanthier v. Family Dollar Store 836 So. 2d 5 La. 2002
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 .
  • Plaquemines Parish Government v. State 826 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713 (La.1/26/96), .
  • Williams v. JACKSON PARISH HOSP. 768 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Schoening 770 So. 2d 762 La. 2000
    Similarly, in Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 6 (La.1/26/96), , the court set aside the trial judge's ruling that a statute was unconstitutional and remanded the issue because the proper procedure for challenging the statute was not followed at the trial level.
  • Istre v. Meche 770 So. 2d 776 La. 2000
    Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), ; Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 .
  • TENET HEALTHSYSTEMS v. Parish of St. Tammany 762 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, pp. 4-6 (La.1/26/96), .
  • State v. Mansion 733 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Williams v. State, 95-0713 (La.1/26/96), .
  • Williams v. Jackson Parish Hosp. 729 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals
  • Leger v. Coccaro 714 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Williams v. State Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713 (La.1/26/96); .
  • Legros v. Westlake Polymers Corp. 704 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    See Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713 (La.1/26/96); .
  • Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals 703 So. 2d 579 La. 1997
    Williams v. State, 95-0713 (La.1/26/96), .
  • Koeppen v. Raz 702 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Williams v. State, DHH, 95-0713 (La.01/26/96), ; Ayers v. Brazzell, 26,068 (La.App.2d Cir. 09/21/94), ; (La.App.
  • Porter v. Saia Motor Freight Line, Inc. 692 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    In Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713, pp. 5-6 (La.1/26/96); , the supreme court held that: The law in this area is clear.
  • Paradigm Ins. v. La. Patient Comp. Fund Bd. 680 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Brown v. Risk Exchange, Inc. 674 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Carver, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 672 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    1/26/96), the constitutional issues are not properly before this court.