Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 668 So. 2d 1135.

38 citing documents.

Kathleen Welch and Carroll Dewayne Welch v. United Medical Healthwest-New Orleans L.L.C. and United Medical Healthcare Inc. La. 2025
The Cartesian Company, Inc. and Greg Gachassin v. the Division of Administrative Law Ethics Adjudicatory Board Panel a … La. 2023
State of Louisiana v. James Cody McMahon La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
2/28/96), Pesnell v. Sessions, supra.
Westlawn Cemeteries, L.L.C. v. The Louisiana Cemetery Board La. 2022
2/28/96), (“the sole issue before the court on this direct appeal is the constitutionality of Section 1032 on its face.
Terence Alost, M.D. v. Danny Lawler, Danny Lawler Enterprises L.L.C., & Willis-Knighton Medical Center La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Conrad Comeaux, In His Official Capacity As Assessor La. 2021
West Baton Rouge Parish Council v. Joseph Gordon Tullier, Sr., Rae Q. Tullier, Barton James Tullier and Phillip … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Andrew Fairbanks Versus Brooke Beninate La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Larry Bize, Sr. and Michelle R. Bize v. Malcolm Larvadain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Bize v. Larvadain 263 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/28/96), , 1144 (quoting Bazley v. Tortorich , , 485 (La.1981) ).
In re S.D. 250 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Pesnell v. Sessions 246 So. 3d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
David Carver v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety 239 So. 3d 226 La. 2018
Estelle v. Eysinki 147 So. 3d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Soloco, Inc. v. Dupree, 97-1256, p. 3 (La.1/21/98), ; Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621, pp. 7-8 (La.2/28/96)
Johnson v. Motiva Enterprises LLC 128 So. 3d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96), , the Supreme Court upheld the granting of tort immunity to principals under the “integral relationship” test.
Oubre v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan 79 So. 3d 987 La. 2011
Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 1995-2621 (La.2/28/96), .
Kenly v. Fuller 69 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96), .
Oubre v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan 53 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621, p. 7 (La.2/28/96), .
Rhone v. Ward 31 So. 3d 591 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
|4Since statutes are presumed to be constitutional, “the party challenging the validity of a statute generally has the burden of proving unconstitutionality.” State v. Granger, supra, at 786, quoting Moore v. RLCC Techs., Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96), .
State v. Granger 982 So. 2d 779 La. 2008
Moore v. RLCC Techs., Inc., 95-2621, pp. 7-8 (La.2/28/96), ; see also Roemer, 567 So.2d at 79 .
Wood v. Brian Harris Autoplex 923 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621, p. 7 (La.2/28/96), .
Farm Fresh Food Supplier, Inc. v. Davis 915 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621, pp. 7 (La.2/28/96), .
Sanders v. Silverthorn 906 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621, p. 9 (La.2/28/96), .
Albright v. Southern Trace Country Club 879 So. 2d 121 La. 2004
In Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621, pp. 9-10 (La.2/28/96), -1141 , this court stated: In the middle of the spectrum are laws that fall within the express prohibition set forth in the third sentence of La.
Allain v. Martco Partnership 828 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621, pp. 7-8 (La.2/28/96), .
State v. Fleury 799 So. 2d 468 La. 2001
See Soloco, Inc. v. Dupree, 97-1256, p. 3 (La.1/21/98), ; Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621, p. 7-8 (La.2/28/96), ; Moore v. Roemer, 567 So.2d at 78 .
Jones v. WT HENNING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL 721 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Manuel v. State, 95-2189 (La.3/8/96); ; Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96); .
Faul v. Trahan 718 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96), ; See also, State ex.
La Seafood Management v. La Wildlife 719 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
See Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96); (noting that the "rational basis standard traditionally [is] applied to legislation involving economics and social welfare" and police power); (Fla.1997) (because fishing is not a fundamental right and commercial fishermen do not constitute a suspect class, the rational bas
La. Seafood Management Council v. La. Wildlife and Fisheries Com'n 715 So. 2d 387 La. 1998
See Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96); (noting that the "rational basis standard traditionally [is] applied to legislation involving economics and social welfare" and police power); (Fla.1997) (because fishing is not a fundamental right and commercial fishermen do not constitute a suspect class, the rational bas
Revere v. Canulette 715 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
The recent Louisiana Supreme Court case of Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96), , contains a detailed discussion of the analysis to be applied in equal protection cases.
Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. v. Foster 711 So. 2d 675 La. 1998
See, Manuel [ v. State, 95-CA-2189 (La.7/2/96), ]; Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96)
Soloco, Inc. v. Dupree 707 So. 2d 12 La. 1998
See, Manuel, supra at 339 ; Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc. 95-2621 (La.2/28/96), ; (La.
Livingston Downs Racing Ass'n v. State 705 So. 2d 149 La. 1998
Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96), ; See also, State ex.
Legros v. Westlake Polymers Corp. 704 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96); .
Lewis v. Roemer 696 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
In Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96); , the Court delineated the levels of review or scrutiny | ¿required for various types of legislative enactments.
Kirkland v. Riverwood Intern. USA, Inc. 681 So. 2d 329 La. 1996
Moore v. RLCC Technologies, Inc., 95-2621 (La.2/28/96), (citing Malone & Johnson, supra, § 128).
Manuel v. State 677 So. 2d 116 La. 1996