Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Orleans Parish School Bd. v. Scheyd, Inc., 673 So. 2d 274.

16 citing documents.

Nyress Manning on Behalf of Minor Child, Corey Williams, Jr., for the Wrongful Death of Dereial Manning and … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
App. 4 Cir. 4/24/96), ).
Forrest v. Ville St. John Owners Ass'n, Inc. 259 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 4/24/96), , 279, this Court espoused that "[i]t would be illogical, and perhaps against public policy, to provide a specific coverage, collect a premium, then by way of endorsement, totally exclude that coverage."
Rider v. Ambeau 100 So. 3d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4th Cir.4/24/96), (“It would be illogical, and perhaps against public policy, to provide a specific coverage, collect a premium, then by way of endorsement, totally exclude that coverage”); and Gaylord Chemical Corporation, 753 So.2d at 356, citing Orleans Parish School Bd.
Mangerchine v. Reaves 63 So. 3d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Encompass Insurance Co. v. Gammon Roofing, L.L.C. 996 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 4/24/96), (stating that “[i]t would be illogical, and perhaps against public policy, to provide a specific coverage, collect a premium, then by way of endorsement, totally exclude that coverage.”) Essex counters that simply because Gammon Roofing admitted in its application that it performed a small amount of torch work do
Holzenthal v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 950 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 4/24/96) , and Suire v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, supra.
Holzenthal v. SEWERAGE & WATER BD. OF NO 950 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 4/24/96) , and Suire v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, supra.
Rando v. Top Notch Properties, LLC 879 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 4/24/96) , , chose to explain away Fredeman Shipyard on this issue and, therefore, implicitly explained away Vitenas as well: Thus, we find that the rationale of Fredeman is based, not on the notion that improper or defective workmanship can never be an occurrence, but on the fact that it was excluded by the work product exclusi
Nalty v. D.H. Holmes Co. 882 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Clark v. Legion Ins. Co. 853 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Dean v. United Medical Center 816 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Lightell v. Phillip 797 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Nalty v. DH Holmes Co., Ltd. 775 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Gaylord Chemical Corp. v. ProPump, Inc. 753 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Jefferson v. Chevron USA Inc. 713 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Singleton v. United Tugs, Inc. 710 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
See also, Orleans Parish School Board v. Scheyd, Inc., (La.App.