Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Scramuzza, 673 So. 2d 1249.

19 citing documents.

Bryant George, M.D. & Dura Mater, Inc. v. Christus Health Southwestern Louisiana D/B/A Christus St. Patrick Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5 Cir. 4/3/96), Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App.
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Monteleone 106 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Lauricella Land Co. 65 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 4/30/96) ; , aff'd in part, rev’d on other grounds in part, 96-1796 (La.4/8/97); .
The Cowboy Connection, Inc. v. State of La., Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 4/3/96), Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App.
Lawson v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America 938 So. 2d 35 La. 2006
5 Cir. 4/3/96) , ; Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App.
Andrews v. Dufour 882 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 4/3/96) , ; Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App.
Petranick v. White Consolidated Industries 870 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
App 5th Cir. 4/30/96), .
Madison v. ERNEST N. MORIAL CONVENT. CENTER 834 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 4/3/96) , ; Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App.
Harris v. United Agents Insurance Co. of Louisiana 784 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 4/30/96) , ; Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App.
Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 784 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 774 So. 2d 84 La. 2000
5 Cir. 4/3/96) , ; Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App.
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 751 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
5 Cir. 4/3/96) , : “A JNOV is properly granted ‘only when the facts and inferences are so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party’ that the trial judge believes reasonable men could not have arrived at a contrary verdict.” Adams v. Security Ins.
Ganucheau v. Winn Dixie LA., Inc. 746 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5 Cir. 4/30/96) , , affirmed in part, 96-1796, 96-1820 (La.4/8/97) .
Mendoza v. Mashburn 747 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir.4/3[0]/96), : "A JNOV is properly granted `only when the facts and inferences are so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party' that the trial judge believes reasonable men could not have arrived at a contrary verdict."
Kistner v. King 726 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
App. 5 Cir. 4/3/96), : "A JNOV is properly granted `only when the facts and inferences are so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party' that the trial judge believes reasonable men could not have arrived at a contrary verdict."
STATE, DOTD v. August Christina & Bros., Inc. 716 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 4/30/96) , , writ denied, 96-1796 (La.11/1/96), , aff'd in part, rev'd on other grounds in part, 96-1796 (La.4/8/97), set forth in great detail the law germane to a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Scramuzza 692 So. 2d 1024 La. 1997
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Stone 692 So. 2d 1241 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Lambert v. State, Through Dept. of Transp. 683 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
5 Cir. 4/30/96) , , we discussed the law relating to Motions for Judgments Notwithstanding the Verdict: A JNOV is properly granted "only when the facts and inferences are so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the trial judge believes reasonable men could not have arrived at a contrary verdict."

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by