Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McCarthy v. Berman, 668 So. 2d 721.

24 citing documents.

L. Kevin Coleman v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Ken Comer Auctioneers, Inc. D/B/A Harvest Motors v. Theresa Ann Harmon & Goauto Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Shane Eads v. Chartis Specialty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Eads v. Chartis Specialty Ins. Co. 133 So. 3d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“[A]n ambiguity exists in an insurance policy when the pertinent provision can reasonably be | inconstrued in two different ways.” McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456, p. 8 (La.2/28/96), .
Tim Wagner v. Inn of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Wagner v. Inn of Lake Charles 49 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.2/28/96), .
Louisiana Stadium & Exposition District v. BFS Diversified Products, LLC 49 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
insurance does not apply to ‘bodily injury’, ‘property damage’, or ‘personal injury’ or ‘advertising injury5 arising out of any rendering of, or failure to render, any ‘professional services’ by or on behalf of any insui’ed.” The Supreme Court distinguished between coverage under a professional services policy and a commercial general liability policy in McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.2/28/96), .
Capitol Anesthesia Group, P.A. v. Gus Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.02/28/96)
Capitol Anesthesia Group, P.A. v. Watson 7 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.02/28/96), ....
Geneva Vidrine v. Jason Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.02/28/96)
Vidrine v. LaFleur 979 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.02/28/96), .
Johnson v. Misirci 955 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
McCarthy v. Berman, D.C., 95-1456 (La.2/28/96), .
Kevin James Mouton v. Allison Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Mouton v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
at 942 (citing McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.2/28/96), ).
Proshee v. Shree, Inc. 893 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.02/28/96), .
Dennis Proshee v. Shree, Inc. D/B/A Southerner Motel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Gaynell Finnie, Indiv. v. Jerry Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
2/28/96), has said, an “insurance policy cannot purport to provide coverage which applies to no one because of a policy exclusion that overrides all of the coverage provided.” However, we do not find that is the case in this policy.
Finnie v. LeBlanc 856 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Finnie points out that the Louisiana Supreme Court, in McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.2/28/96), , has said, an "insurance policy cannot purport to provide coverage which applies to no one because of a policy exclusion that overrides all of the coverage provided."
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 833 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See Justice Watson's dissent in McCarthy v. Berman , 95-1456, p. 3 (La.2/28/96), .
Merlin B. Smith, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty 811 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
See McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.2/28/96), , citing William Shelby McKenzie & H. Alston Johnson, III, Insurance Law and Practice, 15 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise §§ 201 (1986).
Smith v. Reliance Ins. Co. of Illinois 807 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.2/28/96), .
Hardge v. Dubosq 797 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.2/28/96); ; Pareti v. Sentry Indem.
Nerness v. CHRISTIAN FIDELITY LIFE INS. 733 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.2/28/96); ; Pareti v. Sentry Indem.
Bernard v. Chrysler Ins. Co. 734 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
McCarthy v. Berman, 95-1456 (La.2/28/96); ; Pareti v. Sentry Indem.