DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Found., 679 So. 2d 893.

51 citing documents.

  • Hon. John W. Greene (Ret.), as Undertutor of and on Behalf of the Minor Child, Haley Jones Versus … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
  • Medical Review Panel of Williams v. Emsa Louisiana, Inc. 203 So. 3d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Jackson ex rel. Tyler v. Farquhar 207 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    9/5/96), ; Foster v. Patwardhan, 48,575 (La.
  • Khammash v. Clark 145 So. 3d 246 La. 2014
    Found., 95-3074, p. 4 (La.9/5/96), ; Russo v. Vasquez, 94-2407, p. 5 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Willis v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation 140 So. 3d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Found., 95-3074 21(La.9/5/96); ; La.
  • Watkins v. Lake Charles Memorial Hospital 144 So. 3d 944 La. 2014
    See Williamson v. Hospital Service District No. 1 of Jefferson, 2004-0451 (La.12/1/04), -86 ; Hall v. Brookshire Brothers, Ltd., 2002-2404 (La.6/27/03), ; Bijou v. Alton \xOchsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), (-83 (La.1995)).
  • Foster v. Patwardhan 132 So. 3d 495 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Found., 95-3074 (La.09/05/96), ; Miller v.Willis-Knighton Bossier, 41,476 (La.App.2d Cir.09/20/06), .
  • Cannatella v. Cougle 119 So. 3d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Found., 95-3074 (La.9/5/96); ; La.
  • Paulsell v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 112 So. 3d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    king or supervision over medical and related care claims and to vest such exclusive jurisdiction in the agency legislatively assigned to administer the [Patients’ Compensation Fund], subject only to court review of the agency’s actions pursuant to well established principles of judicial review.” Kelty, 633 So.2d at 1218-19 ; see also Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), ; and Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund Oversight Board v. Edwards, 39,149, pp. 6-7 (La.App.2d C
  • Kenneth Duplechain v. Firooz Jalili La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Duplechain v. Jalili 52 So. 3d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), .
  • Kenneth Walter Tiedeman, Jr. v. Edward Calvert, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Tiedeman v. Calvert 998 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Found., 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), .
  • Steen v. PROFESSIONAL LIAB. INS. CO. OF AM. 962 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Kelty, 633 So.2d at 1218-1219 ; see also Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Foundation, 95-3074 (La.09/05/1996), (plaintiff who received a favorable trial court judgment finding him in need of future medical care and related benefits was directed to make claim to the PCFOB for further action and recovery of his future medical care claim).
  • Miller v. Bossier 940 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), ; Jordan, supra .
  • Pamela Sharonette Bartee, Individually and as Tutrix and Administratrix of the Estate of Her Minor Child, Jamie Denise … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    9/5/96), that the PCFOB has exclusive jurisdiction over all claims for future medical care and related benefits, the trial court retains continuing jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to La.R.S.
  • Bartee v. CHILD. CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST LOUIS. 910 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    40:1299.43(A),(B)(1), (C), and (E) and stated: While we agree with the PCF and the holdings in Kelty v. Brumfield, 93-1142 (La.2/25/94), , and Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), , that the PCFOB has exclusive jurisdiction over all claims for future medical care and related benefits, the trial court retains continuing jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to La.R.S.
  • Hanks v. Seale 904 So. 2d 662 La. 2005
    Found., 95-3074, p. 4 (La.9/5/96), ; Russo v. Vasquez, 94-2407, p. 5 (La.1/17/95), .
  • LOUISIANA PCFOB v. Edwards 891 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    The Kelty decision was followed in Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), , wherein a plaintiff who received a favorable trial court judgment finding him in need of future medical care and related benefits was directed, in accordance with Kelty, supra, to make a claim to the PCFOB for further action and recovery of his future medical care claim.
  • Harriett Ardala Yates v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Yates v. State Department of Transportation & Development 862 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Karen Unkel v. W.O. Moss Regional Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    9/5/96), Reidling v. Smith, 02-778 (La.App.
  • Unkel v. W.O. Moss Regional Hospital 862 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Found., 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), ; Reidling v. Smith, 02-778 (La.App.
  • Richard McNabb v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company and Dr. Clinton E. Hart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    9/5/96), p. 896 (wherein the supreme court again stated that “the Fund cannot contest liability when there is a binding settlement for $100,000 by the health care provider, either before or after trial.”) But see Richardson v. O’Byrne, 00-2202 (La.App.
  • McNabb v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance 858 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Found., 95-3074, p. 5 (La.9/5/96), p. 896 (wherein the supreme court again stated that “the Fund cannot contest liability when there is a binding settlement for $100,000 by the health care provider, either before or after trial.”) But see Richardson v. O’Byrne, 00-2202 (La.App.
  • Yong Turner v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Assoc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Turner v. Southwest Louisiana Hosp. Ass'n 856 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Found., 95-3074, p. 6 (La.9/5/96), .
  • WEST EX REL. WEST v. Watson 843 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    art. 966(B); Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), .
  • West ex rel. West v. Watson 843 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    art. 966(B); Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), .
  • Harrison v. Smith 832 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), .
  • Coleman v. Deno 832 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    40:1299.43(D); Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96); .
  • Ceasar v. Barry 823 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Found., 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), ; Bramlet v. The Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund, 98-1728 (La.11/6/98), .
  • Bridgers v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Ass'n 799 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    While we agree with the PCF and the holdings in Kelty v. Brumfield, 93-1142 (La.2/25/94), , and Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), , that the PCFOB has exclusive jurisdiction over all claims for future medical care and related benefits, the trial court retains continuing jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to La.R.S.
  • Chacon v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. 797 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), .
  • Coleman v. Deno 787 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), ; Accardo v. Cenac, 97 2320 (La.
  • Perkins v. Coastal Emergency Medical Services 779 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Found., 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), , I conclude this is not such a case, given the scant evidence presented.
  • Judalet v. Kusalavage 762 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Found., 95-3074 (La.9/5/96); .
  • Mesa v. Spurlock 761 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 p. 6 (La.9/5/96), .
  • Potier v. Commissioner of Ins. 753 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074, p. 4 (La.9/5/96), .
  • Ricard v. Smith 736 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    elly v. Brumfield, 93-1142 (La.2/25/94), , 1218-19 the Supreme Court held that a claim for future medical care and related benefits is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Board and that the Board’s decisions of such claims are subject to court review under “well established principles of judicial review.” See also Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), ; Descant v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, 95-0751 (La.App.
  • Evans v. Nogues 726 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), , citing
  • Accardo v. Cenac 722 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    40:1299.43(D); Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96); .
  • Moody v. United Nat. Ins. Co. 743 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    Further, appellees contend
  • Bramlet v. LA. PATIENTS'COMP. FUND 712 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    Further, appellees contend, (La.
  • Lejano v. Bandak 705 So. 2d 158 La. 1998
    art. 966; Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/15/96), .
  • Taylor v. Tulane University of Louisiana 699 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    40:1299.44(C)(5); Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Found., 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), ; -74 (La.1990).
  • Hawthorn v. City of Bossier City 697 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    art. 966(B); Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), .
  • Harrison v. Smith 694 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    Plaintiff based this motion on the recent decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court in Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/5/96), .
  • Lejano v. Bandak 688 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    art. 966; Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, 95-3074 (La.9/15/96), .
  • Orillion v. Allstate Ins. Co. 690 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Found., 95-3074, p. 6 (La.9/5/96), .