Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Matthews, 655 So. 2d 341.

17 citing documents.

State v. Williams 93 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
In State v. Matthews, 26,550 (La.App.2d Cir.12/21/94), , writ denied, 95-0435 (La.6/16/95), , this court stated: A confession obtained by direct or implied promises, however slight, or by the exertion of any improper influence must be considered involuntary and inadmissible.
State of Louisiana v. Martin P. Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2 Cir. 12/21/94), writ denied, 95-0435 (La.6/12/95), (La.App.
State v. Grace 61 So. 3d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2 Cir. 12/21/94), , writ denied, 95-435 (La.6/16/95), .
State v. Ashley 22 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
2d Cir.12/21/94), , writ denied, 95-0435 (La.6/16/95), .
State of Louisiana v. Norris A. Palms La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
6/1/95), the second circuit concluded the State provided adequate racially neutral reasons for exercising its peremptory challenge to a potential juror rather than question him as to who he would believe if the witnesses he knew were to present conflicting testimony, since this questioning could have tainted the entire ju
State v. Gourdine 946 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Randle, 31,070 (La.App.2d Cir.09/23/98), ; State v. Matthews, 26,550 (La.App.2d Cir.12/21/94), , writ denied, 95-0435 (La.06/16/95), .
State v. Redditt 868 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
2 Cir. 12/21/94), , writ denied, 95-0435 (La.6/12/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Nightengale 818 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Quoting State v. Matthews, 26,550 (La.App.2d Cir.12/21/94), , writ denied, 95-0435 (La.06/16/95), , this court, in State v. Roddy, supra at 1277 , stated: A confession obtained by direct or implied promises, however slight, or by the exertion of any improper influence must be considered involuntary and inadmissible.
State v. Franklin 803 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
2d Cir.12/21/94), , writ denied, 95-0435 (La.6/16/95), , this court stated: A confession obtained by direct or implied promises, however slight, or by the exertion of any improper influence must be considered involuntary and inadmissible.
State v. Jeselink 799 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
App.2d Cir.12/21/94), , writ denied, 95-0435 (La.6/16/95), , this court stated: A confession obtained by direct or implied promises, however slight, or by the exertion of any improper influence must be considered involuntary and inadmissible.
State v. Roddy 756 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2nd Cir. 12/21/94), , writ denied, 95-0435 (La.6/16/95), , this court stated: A confession obtained by direct or implied promises, however slight, or by the exertion of any improper influence must be considered involuntary and inadmissible.
State v. Gaspard 709 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
2 Cir. 12/21/94); , writ denied, 95-0435 (La.6/16/95); , was quoted: A confession obtained by direct or implied promises, however slight, or by the exertion of any improper influence must be considered involuntary and inadmissible.
Hall v. Lilly 697 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Matthews, 26,550 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/21/94), , writ denied 95-0435 (La.6/16/95), .
State v. Joe 678 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Allen 677 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
6/16/95), (for the proposition that a trial court must consider the advisory guidelines and state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis for the imposition of the sentence imposed), defendant asserts that, because of the alleged failures by the trial court, this Court is unable to adequately
State v. Gaspard 685 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
6/16/95), , the defendant made a statement to the police about his involvement in a drug distribution conspiracy, but claimed he did so after he was told making such a statement would help him.
State v. Jasper 677 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996